CHAPTER 9 Resolving Negotiation (Interest) Disputes and the Use of Economic Pressure
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
It reduces the cost of not reaching agreement, thereby causing a “chilling effect” on the parties’ incentive to
reach an agreement.
It affords the arbitrator the least degree of flexibility to determine an appropriate settlement outcome, opening
the door to arbitration.
It affords the arbitrator the greatest degree of flexibility to determine an appropriate settlement outcome.
Anticipating arbitration may change psychology of how bargaining teams bargain.
31. The employer in a labor dispute with whom the striking employees (union) have a dispute and has the ability to end
the dispute is called the:
Management bargaining team
32. All but one of the following ways are used by mediators to apply pressure in a bargaining session. Which one is not
applied?
Using delays and deadlines
Siding with one party over the other.
Engaging in marathon bargaining sessions
Placing responsibility on the parties involved.
No need by mediators to apply pressure in a bargaining session.
33. Each of the following is listed as a major factor that could cause a strike, except one. Which one is not a major factor?
Employees feeling that wages should be higher
Rank and file disagreement with union leadership
Misperception between bargaining parties
A unilateral change by management
34. In relation to a mediator, an arbitrator has:
More power and more responsibility.
Less power, but more flexibility.
More power and greater innovation.
Less power and more appeal.
Less power and less flexibility.
35. A strike is not entered into lightly by an employee. Which of the following items is least likely to be considered?
What will other people think of me?