chapter 9
alliances are more complex and risky than domestic strategic alliances.
the same stage of the value chain combine their assets to create additional value. Usually they are formed to improve long-
term product development and distribution opportunities. Horizontal complementary strategies can be unstable because
they often join highly rivalrous competitors. In addition, even though partners may make similar investments, they rarely
benefit equally from the alliance. The competition response strategy involves alliances formed to react to competitors’
actions. Usually they respond to strategic, rather than tactical, actions because the alliances are difficult to reverse and
expensive to operate. The uncertainty-reducing strategy is used to hedge against risk and uncertainty, such as when
entering new product markets or in emerging economies. Both of these strategies are less effective in the long-run than the
complementary alliances that are focused on creating value.
Competition reducing (collusive) strategies are often illegal. There are two types of collusive competition reducing
strategies: explicit collusion and tacit collusion. Explicit collusion exists when firms directly negotiate production output
and pricing agreements to reduce competition. These are illegal in the United States and in most developed economies.
Tacit collusion exists when several firms in an industry indirectly coordinate their production and pricing decisions by
observing each other’s competitive actions and responses. Both types of collusion result in lower production levels and
higher prices for consumers.
119. A network cooperative strategy is a cooperative strategy wherein several firms form multiple partnerships to achieve
shared objectives. Stable alliance networks (primarily found in mature industries) usually involve exploitation of
economies of scale or scope. In this type of network, the firms try to extend their competitive advantages to other settings
while continuing to profit from operations in their core industries. Dynamic alliance networks (witnessed mainly in
rapidly changing industries) are used to help a firm keep up when technologies shift rapidly by stimulating product
innovation and successful market entries. Dynamic alliance networks explore new ideas and typically generate frequent
product innovations with short product life cycles.
120. The ability to effectively manage competitive strategies can be one of a firm’s core competencies. There are two
basic approaches to managing competitive alliances. Cost minimization leads firms to develop protective formal contracts
and effective monitoring systems to manage alliances. Its focus is to prevent opportunistic behavior by the partner(s).
Opportunity maximization is intended to maximize value creation opportunities. It is less formal and places fewer
constraints on partner behaviors. But, identifying trustworthy partners is the key to this second approach. If (well-
founded) trust is present, monitoring costs are lowered and opportunities will be maximized. Trust is more difficult to
establish between international partners. Ironically, the cost minimization approach is more expensive to implement and to
use than the opportunity maximization approach.
121. Cooperative strategies are not risk-free strategy choices; as many as 70 percent fail. If a contract is not developed
appropriately and fails to avert opportunistic behavior, or if a potential partner firm misrepresents its competencies or fails
to make available promised complementary resources, failure is likely. Furthermore, a firm may make investments that
are specific to the alliance while the partner does not. This puts the investing firm at a disadvantage in terms of return on
investment. The core of many failures is the lack of trustworthiness of the partner(s) who act opportunistically.
122. A cross-border strategic alliance is an international cooperative strategy in which firms headquartered in different
nations combine some of their resources and capabilities to create a competitive advantage. The typical reasons follow: 1)
In general, multinational firms outperform firms operating only on a domestic basis. Firms may be able to leverage core