chapter 6
134. High corporate performance eliminates the need for diversification. Some research shows that low returns are related
to greater levels of diversification. Firms plagued by poor performance often diversify in an effort to become more
profitable. But, continued poor performance following diversification may slow the pace of diversification and may lead
to divestitures and a focus on the core business. In addition, firms that are more broadly diversified compared to their
competitors may have lower overall performance. Figure 6.3 shows that the related constrained diversification strategy is
the highest performing strategy. So poor performing firms that intend to diversify should look at purchasing businesses
that would be suitable for this strategy rather than moving into unrelated diversification or retaining a dominant business
strategy.
135. A top-level manager may be motivated to pursue diversification because diversification leads to greater job security
for executives. In general, greater amounts of diversification reduce managerial risk because if a particular business fails,
the top executive remains employed by the corporation. In addition, diversification increases firm size, and firm size has a
direct effect on executive compensation. Moreover, managing a highly diversified firm is more difficult; thus, managerial
compensation is generally higher in such a firm. Consequently, executives may have selfish motives to diversify the
company in ways which may actually reduce corporate competitiveness.
136. Unrelated diversification can create value through two types of financial economies (cost savings). 1) Unrelated
diversified firms can more efficiently allocate capital among the component businesses than can the external financial
market. This is possible because the corporate-level management has more complete information about the performance
of the component businesses and it can also discipline under-performing management teams. 2) Unrelated diversified
firms can also create value by purchasing other businesses at low prices, restructuring them, and reselling them at a higher
price. This practice is most successful with mature, low-technology businesses, rather than high-technology or service
businesses, which are more dependent on employees who may leave.
137. A business-level strategy determines how a firm will compete in a single industry or product market. When a firm
diversifies beyond a single industry it uses a corporate-level strategy. A diversified company has two levels of strategy:
business-level and corporate-level. Each business unit has a business level strategy. The corporate strategy is concerned
with: 1) what businesses the firm should be in and 2) how the corporate office should manage the group of businesses.
The top management of diversified companies views the firm’s businesses as a portfolio of core competencies that will
generate above-average returns by creating value. An example of a business-level strategy would be whether the firm
targets the mass market and competes on price, or whether it competes on the basis of uniqueness. An example of a
corporate-level strategy would be whether the firm should sell off a poorly performing subsidiary.
138. Firms typically diversify to increase the firm’s value by improving its overall performance. Value-creating
diversification occurs through related or unrelated diversification when the strategy allows the company’s business units to
increase revenues or reduce costs while implementing business level strategies. Alternatively, a firm may diversify to gain
market power over competitors. Value-neutral diversification may occur in response to governmental policies, firm
performance problems, or uncertainties about future cash flows. Finally, managers may have selfish motives to diversify,
such as increased compensation or personal reduced employment risk. These selfish motivations may actually erode the