chapter 5
involved and the degree of importance of the individual markets to each. When firms produce similar products and
compete for the same customers, the competitive rivalry is likely to be high. Firms competing against one another in
several or many markets engage in multimarket competition. Research suggests that a firm with greater multimarket
contact is less likely to initiate an attack, but more likely to respond when attacked. In general, multimarket competition
reduces competitive rivalry but some firms will still compete when the potential rewards (e.g., potential market share
gain) are high.
Resource similarity is the extent to which the firm’s tangible and intangible resources are comparable to a competitor’s in
terms of both type and amount. Firms with resource similarity are likely to have similar strengths and weaknesses and to
use similar strategies.
The combination of high or low market commonality and high or low resource similarity identifies whether firms are
competitors. Firms having both high market commonality and high resource similarity are direct and mutually
acknowledged competitors. If firms share few markets and have little similarity in resources they are not direct and
mutually acknowledged competitors.
106. Competitors are firms competing in the same market, offering similar products, and targeting similar customers.
Competitive rivalry is the ongoing set of competitive actions and competitive responses occurring between competitors as
they compete against each other for an advantageous market position. For the individual firm, the set of competitive
actions and responses it takes while engaged in competitive rivalry is called competitive behavior. Competitive dynamics
is the set of actions and responses taken by all firms that are competitors within a particular market.
107. First movers can gain market share, customer loyalty, and high revenues by being the first in the market. But, first
movers also take more risk because it is difficult to judge the returns the firm will earn from product innovations.
Moreover, if the first mover is successful, other firms will enter its arena. First movers tend to have a significant amount
of organizational slack to fund research and development. Second movers imitate the first movers, after they have studied
the first mover’s successes and mistakes. Consequently, second movers can develop more efficient processes and
technologies than first movers, which results in lower costs. Late movers react to the first and second movers’ actions after
a long delay. A late mover may be able to earn average returns if it has learned how to create at least as much value for
customers as the value created by the first and second movers. In general, late movers are relatively ineffective.
1. Firms with high market commonality and highly similar resources are direct and mutually acknowledged competitors.
2. The more dependent a firm is on its market, the more aggressively it will defend it from another competitor.
3. The satellite dish at Faye’s weekend home has malfunctioned. When she calls to have the dish repaired, the service
representative tells her that the dish is obsolete and that parts for it are no longer made. Faye must replace the old dish
with a new dish. This is an example of lack of firm loyalty to a product in a fast-cycle market.
4. Market commonality is concerned with the number of markets with which the firm and a competitor are jointly
involved and the degree of importance of the individual markets to each.
5. A strategy’s success is determined not only by the firm’s initial competitive actions but also by how well it anticipates