chapter 4
use of the differentiation strategy. If the firm has a thorough understanding of what its target customers value, the relative
advantageous position, especially in logistics, rivals cannot reduce their costs lower than the cost leaders’, and so they
cannot earn above-average returns. 2) Buyers: The cost leadership strategy also protects against the power of customers.
Powerful customers can drive prices lower, but they are not likely to be driven below that of the next-most-efficient
industry competitor. Prices below this would cause the next-most-efficient competitor to leave the market, leaving the
costleader in a stronger position relative to the buyer. 3) Suppliers: The cost leadership strategy also allows a firm to better
absorb any cost increases forced on it by powerful suppliers, because the cost leader has greater margins than its
competitors. In fact, a cost leader may be able to force its suppliers to keep prices low for them. 4) Entrants: The cost
leadership strategy also discourages new entrants because the new entrant must be willing to accept no better than average
returns until they gain the experience and core competencies required to approach the efficiency of the cost leader. 5)
Substitutes: For substitutes to be used, they must not only perform a similar function but also be cheaper than the cost
leader’s product. When faced with substitute products, the cost leader can reduce its price.
125. Focus strategies target specific industry segments or niche rather than the entire market. The market can be
segmented into 1) a particular buyer group, 2) a different part of a product line, or 3) different geographic areas. The firm
using a focus strategy hopes to meet the needs of a particular target market better than firms with a more broad-based
approach. Or, they hope to meet needs of a market niche that has been overlooked or neglected by broad-based rivals.
126. Customers have increasingly high expectations for products, wanting products that are both low-priced and
differentiated. So a number of firms are trying to simultaneously follow both a costleadership and a differentiation
strategy. This requires the firm to perform the primary and support activities required of both strategies, which is
challenging. Successful integration of strategies allows firms to adapt quickly to environmental changes, and learn new
technologies. The firm gains more skills which makes it more flexible. Evidence suggests that successful use of integrated
strategies is related to above-average returns. A number of firms such as Target Stores and European-based Zara owe their
success to the integrated cost leadership/differentiation strategy.
127. Students will most likely choose a firm with a cost-leader or differentiation strategy because they are simpler to
describe. The risks of each strategy can be found on pages 117, 121, 123, and 126.
128. Focus firms face three additional risks beyond the general risks of industry-wide strategies. First, a competitor may
be able to focus on a more narrowly defined competitive segment and “outfocus” the focuser. Second, a firm competing
on an industry-wide basis may decide the targeted market segment is attractive and worthy of competitive pursuit. Finally,
the needs of the firm’s customer group may become more similar to the needs of industry-wide customers as a whole,
thereby eliminating the advantages of a focus strategy.
129. The firm must decide (1) who are the customers who will be served, (2) what needs do the target customers have that
must be satisfied, and (3) how will those needs be satisfied by the firm. The choice of target customer (who) usually
involves segmenting the market to cluster people with similar needs into groups. The target customers’ needs drive “what”
benefits and features the firm’s product will have. This involves a choice and balance between cost and differentiation of
the product. Finally, firms use their core competencies (how) to implement value-creating strategies and satisfy customers’
needs.
130. Integrated strategies present risks that go beyond those that arise from the pursuit of any single strategy by itself.
Principal among these risks is that a firm becomes “stuck in the middle.” In such a situation a firm fails to implement
either the differentiation or the cost leadership strategy effectively. The firm will not be able to earn above-average
returns, and without favorable conditions, it will earn below-average returns. Recent research suggests that firms using
either cost leadership or differentiation often outperform firms attempting to use a “hybrid” strategy (i.e., integrated cost
leadership/differentiation). This research suggests the risks associated with the integrated strategy.