CHAPTER 21 CASE C-2
So, the aftertax salvage value in Year 2 will be:
So, the NAL of the lease under the new terms would be:
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2
Saved purchase $3,600,000
Lost salvage value –$1,215,972
So, the NAL of the lease under these terms is:
The NAL of the lease is negative under these terms, so it appears the terms are less favorable for the
lessee. However, the lease will likely be classified as an operating lease. The lease is now for two
years, which is less than 75 percent of the equipment’s life. Using the company’s cost of debt, the
present value of the lease payments is:
This is less than 90 percent of the price of the equipment. As long as the lease contract does transfer
ownership to the lessee at the end of the contact, or allow for a purchase at a bargain price, the FAS
3. a. The inclusion of a right to purchase the equipment will have no effect on the value of the lease.
b. The right to purchase the equipment at a fixed price will have increase the value of the lease. If
the company can purchase the equipment at the end of the lease at below market value, it will
save money, or at a minimum, can purchase the equipment at the fixed price and resell it in the