17. The King I report, established by Mervyn King in 1994, failed to recognize the involvement
of all the corporation’s stakeholders in the efficient and appropriate operation of an organization.
18. The King II report, released by the committee formed by Mervyn King, formally recognized
the need to move the stakeholder model forward and to consider a triple bottom line instead of a
single bottom line of profitability.
19. The triple bottom line proposed by the King II report, released by the committee formed by
Mervyn King, recognizes the economic, environmental, and social aspects of a company’s
activities.