Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Page 15-12
Ezzard, and Tillman.
Potential balances: Ding $60,000 – Loss ($52,800) = Ding Potential Balance $7,200.
Laurel $67,000 – Loss ($26,400) = Laurel Potential Balance $40,600.
Ezzard $17,000 – Loss ($26,400) = Ezzard Potential Balance ($9,400).
Tillman $96,000 – Loss ($26,400) = Tillman Potential Balance $69,600.
Ezzard’s Deficit ($9,400) × 4/8 = Ezzard’s Deficit Portion to Ding ($4,700) and 2/8 × ($9,400) =
Ezzard’s Deficit Portion each to Laurel and Tillman ($2,350).
Tillman potential balance $69,600 + Ezzard’s Deficit Portion ($2,350) = Amount Tillman
Receives from Liquidation $67,250
REFERENCE: 15-07
Dancey, Reese, Newman, and Jahn were partners who shared profits and losses on a 4:2:2:2
basis, respectively. They were beginning to liquidate their business. At the start of the process,
Capital account balances were as follows:
Dancey, capital $ 72,000
Reese, capital 32,000
Newman, capital 52,000
Jahn, capital 24,000
[QUESTION]
REFER TO: 15-07
19. Which one of the following statements is true for a predistribution plan?
A) The first available $16,000 would go to Newman.
B) The first available $20,000 would go to Dancey.
C) The first available $8,000 would go to Jahn.
D) The first available $8,000 would go to Newman.
E) The first available $4,000 would go to Jahn.
20. Which one of the following statements is true for a predistribution plan?
A) The first available $16,000 would go to Newman. The next $12,000 would go $8,000 to
Dancey and $4,000 to Newman. The following $32,000 would be shared equally between
Dancey, Reese, and Newman. A total distribution of $60,000 would be required before all four
partners share any further payments equally.
B) The first available $16,000 would go to Newman. The next $12,000 would go $8,000 to
Dancey and $4,000 to Newman. The following $32,000 would be shared by Dancey, Reese, and