41. Joe made an agreement with Fred to steal Joe’s truck and set it afire in order to collect the insurance money.
The agreement was that Joe would pay Fred $500 up front and the balance of $1,500 after Joe collected his
insurance. However, when the truck was taken, Joe called the police and had Fred arrested for auto theft and
claimed that the $500 was in the truck when it was stolen. Can Fred countersue? Explain your answer.
42. Brian is a commercial retail site developer who enters into an agreement with a local sales consultant
agreeing not to rent commercial retail space to prospective female clients. Is this contract enforceable? Why or
why not?
43. George was doing some extensive landscaping and needed about three acres of Pete’s property to completely
finish the project. Pete agreed to sell George that portion of ground, and they shook hands on it. After George
had finished the project, which included a paved driveway and a drainage system on the portion of land from
Pete, Pete insisted that because there was nothing in writing, the property was still his. Can George get title to
the land in question?
Pete’s silence during the execution of the oral agreement implies acceptance. In addition, George has occupied
44. Sherm is the owner and operator of Billiards & Cues, a wholesale dealer for various brands of pool tables.
Michelle meets with Sherm on several occasions to discuss pricing and delivery of ten pool tables for Michelle’s
restaurants. At one point during negotiations, Sherm offers a price of $34,000 for ten pool tables. Michelle
counteroffers with a price of $30,000, to which Sherm agrees. The day the contract is to be signed, however,
Michelle breaks both of her wrists and is unable to sign the contract. Instead, Michelle uses a stamped signature.
A few days later, Sherm sues Michelle on the basis that the contract is invalid because of the missing element of
her signature. Sherm now believes that the original $34,000 offer was fair and reasonable and wants to bring
evidence from the contract negotiations to the court hearing. What do you believe will be the outcome of this
trial and why?
Answers may vary. Because the contract was one for the selling and purchasing of goods more than $500 in