(a basic moral principle), even hardened criminals; (2) the death penalty is a violation of this
right. The conclusion to this argument is
a. executing criminals is wrong.
b. executing criminals is permissible.
c. executing criminals is costly.
d. executing criminals generates less happiness than life in prison.
9. Delma Banks Jr. was charged with murder; his lawyer failed to vigorously cross-examine an
informant testifying against Banks or to investigate the case. Consequently, Banks may not
have received a fair trial because of poor representation. If so, a retentionist would argue that
the injustice in the conduct of the trial would
a. show that capital punishment was also unjust.
b. be irrelevant to the justice or injustice of capital punishment.
c. be relevant to the injustice of capital punishment.
d. be strong evidence against the death penalty.
10. Suppose a friend of yours says that she’s glad a murderer was recently sentenced to the gas
chamber, because murderers deserve to die. Her comment implies that she accepts the
________ theory of punishment.
a. utilitarian c. retributive
b. deterrence d. preventive
11. Consider this assertion, common in debates on capital punishment: the unjust administration of
a punishment does not entail the injustice of the punishment itself. This view is most likely
espoused by
a. abolitionists. c. retentionists.
b. utilitarians. d. natural law theorists.
12. The issue of forgiving a criminal (for example, commuting a death sentence to life in prison)
forces us to confront a contradiction between mercy (giving someone a break) and
a. justice (giving someone what he deserves).
b. utility (giving someone what will make him happy).
c. love (giving someone unconditional acceptance).
d. fallibility (the tendency to err).
13. The idea that the punishment should match the crime in kind—that justice demands “an eye
for an eye, a life for a life”—is called ________.
a. abolitionism c. proportional retributivism
b. paternalistic retributivism d. lex talionis
TRUE/FALSE
1. For many retentionists, the only necessary justification for the type and degree of punishment
is what the criminal deserves.