Chapter 37 NAME
Public Goods
Introduction. In previous chapters we studied selfish consumers con-
suming private goods. A unit of private goods consumed by one person
cannot be simultaneously consumed by another. If you eat a ham sand-
wich, I cannot eat the same ham sandwich. (Of course we can both eat
ham sandwiches, but we must eat different ones.) Public goods are a dif-
ferent matter. They can be jointly consumed. You and I can both enjoy
looking at a beautiful garden or watching fireworks at the same time. The
conditions for efficient allocation of public goods are different from those
for private goods. With private goods, efficiency demands that if you and
I both consume ham sandwiches and bananas, then our marginal rates of
substitution must be equal. If our tastes differ, however, we may consume
different amounts of the two private goods.
If you and I live in the same town, then when the local fireworks
show is held, there will be the same amount of fireworks for each of us.
Efficiency does not require that my marginal rate of substitution between
fireworks and ham sandwiches equal yours. Instead, efficiency requires
that the sum of the amount that viewers are willing to pay for a marginal
increase in the amount of fireworks equal the marginal cost of fireworks.
This means that the sum of the absolute values of viewers’ marginal rates
of substitution between fireworks and private goods must equal the mar-
ginal cost of public goods in terms of private goods.
Example: A quiet midwestern town has 5,000 people, all of whom are in-
terested only in private consumption and in the quality of the city streets.
The utility function of person iis U(Xi,G)=Xi+AiG−BiG2,whereXi
is the amount of money that person ihas to spend on private goods and
Gis the amount of money that the town spends on fixing its streets. To
find the Pareto optimal amount of money for this town to spend on fixing
its streets, we must set the sum of the absolute values of marginal rates of
substitution between public and private goods equal to the relative prices
of public and private goods. In this example we measure both goods in
dollar values, so the price ratio is 1. The absolute value of person i’s
marginal rate of substitution between public goods and private goods is
the ratio of the marginal utility of public goods to the marginal utility of
private goods. The marginal utility of private goods is 1 and the marginal
utility of public goods for person iis Ai−BiG. Therefore the absolute
value of person i’s MRS is Ai−BiGand the sum of absolute values
of marginal rates of substitution is i(Ai−BiG)=iAi−(Bi)G.
Therefore Pareto efficiency requires that iAi−(iBi)G= 1. Solving
this for G,wehaveG=(
iAi−1)/iBi.
37.1 (0) Muskrat, Ontario, has 1,000 people. Citizens of Muskrat con-
sume only one private good, Labatt’s ale. There is one public good, the
town skating rink. Although they may differ in other respects, inhabitants