978-0136074892 Solution Manual Chapter 07 Part 1

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 6
subject Words 1509
subject Authors Ravi Dhar, Russ Winer

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
Chapter 7: Product Decisions
Chapter Objectives
After reading this chapter, students should understand:
·The elements of brand equity, building strong brand equity, and leveraging
brand equity through brand extensions
·Developing perceptual maps to make positioning and repositioning decisions
·Global and technology-related issues in positioning and branding
·Product line management
·Issues in packaging and product design
Chapter Overview
The purpose of this chapter is focus on areas of product decision-making. Although
some product-related issues were discussed in Chapter 2 as part of the development of a
marketing strategy, this chapter expands those discussions and includes other relevant
topics for marketing managers.
Chapter Outline and Key Terms
Product Decisions
Key Terms:
·Product features
·Product line
·Packaging
·Product design
·Global marketing
·Position
·Joint space
·Multidimensional scaling (MDS)
·Original equipment manufacturer (OEM)
·Global marketing
·Product line strategy
·Cannibalization
·Mass customization
·Customerization
Copyright© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice Hall 1
page-pf2
·Choiceboards
A. Definitions
1. Product features: Are the characteristics or attributes of a product or service.
2. Product line: A group of closely related products.
3. Packaging: The design of the container for the product in which it is
displayed in a retail environment.
4. Product design: Combines art, science, and technology to create tangible
three-dimensional goods.
5. Position: The communication of the value proposition to the customer,
which differentiates the product from competition in the mind of the
prospect.
6. Joint space: A perceptual map that contains both brand spatial locations as
well as consumer perceptions of their ideal brand.
7. Multidimensional scaling (MDS): Develop perceptual maps based on
customer-based judgments of brand similarity.
8. Original equipment manufacturer (OEM): A channel of distribution for
technology-based products; companies that purchase ingredients or
components (e.g., hard disk drives) from manufacturers.
9. Global marketing: A generic term encompassing any marketing activities
outside a company’s home market; also a standardization of the strategies
used to market a product around the world.
10. Product line strategy: A marketing strategy covering a set of related
products.
11. Cannibalization: The amount of sales for a new element of a product line
that is taken away from an existing element of the line.
12. Mass customization: Also called one-to-one marketing, a new marketing
process whereby a company takes a product or service that is widely
marketed and develops a system for customizing it to each customer’s
specifications.
13. Customerization: A process whereby a company takes a product or service
that is widely marketed and perhaps offered to many different configurations
and develops a system for customizing (or nearly customizing) it to each
customers specifications.
page-pf3
14. Choiceboards: Online, interactive systems that allow individual customers to
design their own products by choose from an array of attributes, delivery
options, and prices.
B. Branding
1. Why customers value brands:
·Reduced information search costs.
·Risk reduction.
·Expectations of quality
·Prestige and emotional needs
2. Types of brands
·Corporate brands: Company brands. (Companies like GE, Clorox, etc.,
are corporate names that are brands in themselves.)
·Corporate parent brands: Brand names where the corporate brand is
carried with individual product names. (Snap-on Tool’s heavy duty air
hammer is the PH2050 and referred to as the Snap-on PH2050.)
·Distinct product brands: Brand names separate from the corporate brand.
(Crest is not marketed with the Proctor & Gamble name.)
·Sub-brands: Include the name of the corporate brand along with the
distinct product brand. (Sony PlayStation, Nestle Kit Kat)
·Co-brands: Two independent companies have both brands highlighted in
a product. (Haagen-Daz’s ice cream and M&M’s)
·Ingredient brands: A special case of co-branding. (Intel, Dolby, DuPont’s
Gore-Tex)
3. Dimensions of brand equity
·Brand loyalty: Strongest measure of a brand’s value. How loyal
customers are.
·Brand awareness: Simplest form of brand equity is familiarity.
·Perceived quality: A quality association with the brand.
·Brand association: More subjective and emotional associations are
important parts of brand value.
·Other brand assets: Patents and trademarks are also valuable to products
and services.
·Figure 7.1 Page 181 Brand Equity. Demonstrates brand equity and the
associated dimensions.
· Illustration: Aflac, Inc., (www.aflac.com) Page 182
·Illustration: IKEA, (www.ikea.com) Page 183
4. Building strong brands
·Create brand identity: Differentiate brand from others
·Be consistent over time: Not changing advertising or selling messages
page-pf4
·Track the equity: Measuring the dimensions of equity over time relative
to competitors
·Assign responsibility for brand development activities: Assigning
someone to oversee the brand.
·Invest in the brands: Investing enough in the brand to keep it strong
5. Brand extensions
·Leveraging the brand into new product categories
·Illustration: Brand Extensions Page 184. Include:
·Montblanc wrist watches (from pens)
·ESPN cellular phone service
·Nike into clothing and sportswear
·IBM into IT consulting
·Michelin work boots
·M&M’s stereo ear buds
·Main considerations for fit of an extension to the parent brand category
include:
·Transferability of the associations
·Complementarity of the product
·Similarity of the users
·Transferability of the symbol
· Illustration: Virgin (www.virgin.com) Page 185
·Illustration: Mountain Dew Code Red (www.mountaindew.com)
6. Global Branding
·Theodore Levitt’s Model for Global Branding:
·Consumer convergence
·Demographic convergence
·Decline of the nuclear family
·The changing role of women
·Static populations
·Higher living standards
·Cultural convergence
·Illustration: Table 7.2 Page 188 Best Global Brands
·Illustration: L’Oreal (www.loreal.com) Page 188
·Illustration: Vodafone (www.vodafone.com) Page 188
7. Branding Issues
·Brand personality
·Brand person relationships
·Logos
·Illustration: Audi (www.audi.com) Page 192
·
page-pf5
C. Marketing Return on Investment (ROI) and Branding
1. In context of branding, there are two approaches to measuring brand equity:
·Behavioral measures: These represent how customers have actually
responded to the brand (Table 7.2 Page 188, Leading Global Brands,
demonstrates behavioral measures as related to customer activity.)
2. Alternative model (Developed by Young & Rubicam) is called the Brand
Asset Valuator). The BAV includes four key dimensions:
·Differentiation: How different or unique is the brand from the
competition?
·Relevance: How relevant is the brand to the target customer?
·Esteem: How high is the regard or value for the brand?
·Knowledge: How much information does the customer about the value
of the brand
D. Product Positioning
1. Concept of product positioning becomes clearer when thinking about
different steps involved in product positioning:
·Determine product’s current position.
·If you are satisfied with the position and brand performance, continue
with the current strategy and value proposition. The product is “well-
positioned.”
·If you are dissatisfied with the current position, the brand needs to be
repositioned and the value proposition may need to be modified.
·If the product is new, step 2 is irrelevant and step 3 becomes the position
you are creating for it.
2. Determining a product’s position:
·Attribute-based methods: Perceptual maps (Figure 7.5 Page 196 Credit
Card Joint Space: Attribute-based.) When an ideal “point” is plotted with
the brands, it is called joint space.
·Methods based on similarity judgments: Based on customer-based
judgments. This is called multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) (Figure 7.6
Page 197 Credit Card Joint Space: Multidimensional Scaling Version.)
3. Positioning decisions
page-pf6
·Positioning decisions can be linked to various stages of the product’s life
cycle (Figure 2.8)
·Multiple positions: When a product is being marketed to multiple target
markets, it normal for the value proposition and positioning to be different
·Illustration: Volkswagen Skoda (www.vw.com) Page 198
4. Product feature decisions
·Developing different product features for different segments is particularly
appealing for services and information goods
·Developing different product features for different segments for
manufactured goods can be expensive
·Product or services can be developed or modified for entirely different target
groups (Marriott’s different hotel brands)
5. Product line decisions
·Strategies may have to be developed for a group of closely related products
(product lines)
·Product lines may include complementary products, which are intended to
be used together but could also be marketed separately
·In developing a product line strategy, the marketing manager must address a
number of issues
·How many products should be in the line?
·How should the products in the line be targeted and differentiated?
·How should resources be allocated across the line to maximize profits or
market share?
6. Number of products and differentiation
·Add variants to the line as long as the incremental sales exceed the
incremental costs
·Unsuccessful additions can cost loss of goodwill and have long-term
negative consequences
·Some other negative aspects are in terms of cannibalization (sales of one
product at the expense of other existing products in the line)
·Adding products can have an effect on overall branding (adding a luxury
line for example)
7. Resource allocation
·Resource allocation depends on the nature of the product line
·If products are promoted as a single line, then a single marketing strategy
may be used
·When elements of the line appeal to different segments with different
characteristics such as growth rates or competition, then multiple strategies
or another approach might be used.
·Most popular approach to the above, would be the portfolio approach
(introduced by The Boston Consulting Group)

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.