39
20) Lithium, Inc. is considering two mutually exclusive projects, A and B. Project A costs $95,000 and is
expected to generate $65,000 in year one and $75,000 in year two. Project B costs $120,000 and is expected
to generate $64,000 in year one, $67,000 in year two, $56,000 in year three, and $45,000 in year four.
Lithium, Inc.’s required rate of return for these projects is 10%. Which project would you recommend
using the replacement chain method to evaluate the projects with different lives?
A) Project B because its NPV is higher than Project A‘s replacement chain NPV of $47,623
B) Project A because its replacement chain NPV is $76,652, which exceeds the NPV for Project B
C) Project A because its replacement chain NPV is $45,642, which is less than the NPV for Project B
D) Both projects will be valued the same since they are now both four year projects.
Keywords: Replacement Chain, Net Present Value
Learning Obj.: L.O. 10.4
AACSB: Reflective Thinking
21) Lithium, Inc. is considering two mutually exclusive projects, A and B. Project A costs $95,000 and is
expected to generate $65,000 in year one and $75,000 in year two. Project B costs $120,000 and is expected
to generate $64,000 in year one, $67,000 in year two, $56,000 in year three, and $45,000 in year four.
Lithium, Inc.’s required rate of return for these projects is 10%. The equivalent annual annuity amount for
project B, rounded to the nearest dollar, is
A) $17,385.
B) $20,936.
C) $22,789.
D) $26,551.
Keywords: Equivalent Annual Annuity
Learning Obj.: L.O. 10.4
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
22) Different discounted cash flow evaluation methods may provide conflicting rankings of investment
projects when
A) the size of investment outlays differ.
B) the projects are mutually exclusive.
C) the accounting policies differ.
D) the internal rate of return equals the cost of capital.
Keywords: Capital Budgeting Decisions, Size, Cash Flows vs Accounting Income
Learning Obj.: L.O. 10.4
AACSB: Reflective Thinking