51. Welfare states in social democratic and Christian democratic countries had great success in
the 1950s through the 1960s in combining high economic growth, large welfare states, and
long stretches of time when one party won election after election. Analyze why slowed
economic growth and immigration have become major threats to these kinds of welfare
states that have emerged since 1970.
model.
Topic: Christian Democracy
Difficulty Level: Difficult
Skill Level: Apply What You Know
52. Analyze the ways that the governments in Sweden, Germany, and the United Kingdom
responded to the recession that began in 2007 and 2008. How might their respective policy
responses have fit, or not fit, their respective profiles as social democratic, Christian
democratic, and extreme market democratic nations?
political institutions, and party system within Germany.
Topic: Germany/Political Economy
Difficulty Level: Difficult
Skill Level: Apply What You Know
53. Analyze why extreme market democracies perform worst in all four categories of
capability, and analyze whether a different way of operationally defining the capabilities
would improve the ranking of extreme market countries.
Germany.
Topic: Comparing Capabilities Among Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Germany
Difficulty Level: Difficult
Skill Level: Apply What You Know
54. Critics of social democratic and Christian democratic countries say these countries’ low
levels of poverty and infant mortality have come at the expense of slow growth rates and
high unemployment. Explain which method of comparative analysis would produce the
most convincing results of a test of the hypothesis that countries with high taxes have
slower economic growth than countries low taxes. State your hypothesis and explain how
you would operationally define your independent and dependent variables.
model.
Topic: Christian Democracy
Difficulty Level: Difficult
Skill Level: Apply What You Know
249