4) Empirical research has found that systematic risk for MNEs is greater than that for their
domestic counterparts. This could be due to:
A) the fact that the increase in the correlation of returns between the market and the firm is less
than the increase in the standard deviation of returns of the firm.
B) the fact that the decrease in the correlation of returns between the market and the firm is
greater than the increase in the standard deviation of returns of the firm.
C) the reduction in the correlation of returns between the firm and the market is less than the
increase in the variability of returns caused by factors such as asymmetric information, foreign
exchange risk, and the like.
D) None of the above; systematic risk is less for MNEs than for their domestic counterparts.
5) Empirical studies indicate that MNEs have higher costs of capital than purely domestic firms.
This could be due to higher levels of:
A) political risk.
B) exchange rate risk.
C) agency costs.
D) all of the above
6) Despite the theoretical elegance of this hypothesis, empirical studies have come to the
opposite conclusion.Despite the favorable effect of international diversification of cash flows,
bankruptcy risk was only about the same for MNEs as for domestic firms. However, MNEs
faced higher costs for each of the following EXCEPT:
A) agency costs.
B) political risk.
C) asymmetric information.
D) In fact, each of these costs were higher for the MNE than for the domestic firm.