26.6 Corporate Governance Around the World
1) Which of the following statements is FALSE?
A) In many other countries, the central conlict is between what are called “controlling
shareholders” and “minority shareholders.”
B) Controlling shareholders can make decisions that beneit them disproportionately
relative to the minority shareholders, such as employing family members rather than the
most talented managers or establishing contracts favorable to other family controlled
irms.
C) As recent events and corporate scandals have shown, investor protection in the United
States is generally seen as substandard when compared to the developed economies in the
world.
D) Much of the focus in the United States is on the agency conlict between shareholders,
who own the majority of a irm but are a dispersed group, and managers, who own little of
the irm and must be monitored.
AACSB Objective: Dynamics of the Global Economy
Author: JN
Question Status: Previous Edition
2) Which of the following statements is FALSE?
A) The United States is somewhat of an exception, in that it focuses solely on maximizing
shareholder welfare.
B) A controlling family has many opportunities to expropriate minority shareholders in a
pyramid structure.
C) One way for families to gain control over irms even when they do not own more than
half the shares is to issue dual class shares—a scenario in which companies have more than
one class of shares and one class has superior voting rights over the other class.
D) Researchers have claimed that the degree of investor protection was largely determined
by the legal origin of the country—speciically, whether its legal system was based on
British common law (less protection) or French, German, and Scandinavian civil law (more
protection).
AACSB Objective: Analytic Skills
Author: JN
Question Status: Previous Edition
18