7) Which of the following questions regarding risk arbitrage is FALSE?
A) Once a tender ofer is announced, the uncertainty about whether the takeover will
succeed reduces the volatility of the stock price. This uncertainty creates an opportunity
for investors to speculate on the outcome of the deal without bearing the risk of volatility.
B) Traders known as risk-arbitrageurs, who believe that they can predict the outcome of a
deal, take positions based on their beliefs.
C) A potential proit arises from the diference between the target’s stock price and the
implied ofer price, and is referred to as the merger-arbitrage spread.
D) However, it is not a true arbitrage opportunity because there is a risk that the deal will
not go through. If the takeover did not ultimately succeed, the risk-arbitrageur would
eventually have to unwind his position at whatever market prices prevailed.
AACSB Objective: Analytic Skills
Author: JN
Question Status: Previous Edition
8) Which of the following questions is FALSE?
A) Once the acquirer has completed the valuation process, it is in the position to make a
tender ofer—that is, a public announcement of its intention to purchase a large block of
shares for a speciied price.
B) If we view the pre-bid market capitalization as the stand-alone value of the target, then
from the bidder’s perspective, the takeover is a positive-NPV project only if the synergies
created do not exceed the premium it pays.
C) Purchasing a corporation usually constitutes a very large capital investment decision, so
it requires a more accurate estimate of value that includes careful analysis of both
operational aspects of the irm and the ultimate cash lows the deal will generate.
D) A stock-swap merger is a positive-NPV investment for the acquiring shareholders if the
share price of the merged irm (the acquirer’s share price after the takeover) exceeds the
premerger price of the acquiring irm.
AACSB Objective: Analytic Skills
Author: JN
Question Status: Previous Edition
14