Satisficing:
Fee: All models are acceptable: $29,000
fee
$35,000
Disposition: Models B and Model C are acceptable: 94 disposition 100
Quality: All models are acceptable: 89 quality 100
Physical: Models A and Model B are acceptable: 92 physical 100
Popularity: Models B and Model C are acceptable: 87
popularity
100
Only Model B is acceptable because it is the only one whose attributes all lie in
acceptable ranges.
Dominance:
The results of the pair–comparisons are shown below. Model B dominates
Model A. Thus, Model A is dropped. When comparing Model C to Model B,
Model B dominates Model C. Therefore, Model B should be selected.
Attributes B Vs A C Vs B
Model fee (lower is better) B > A B > C
Disposition B > A B > C
Quality of shooting portfolios B > A B > C
Physical attributes B > A B > C
Popularity B > A B > C
Disjunctive resolution:
All models are acceptable because they are acceptable in at least one attribute.
Lexicography:
The rank is given according to weight as: Physical attributes > Fee > Quality of
portfolio > Popularity > Disposition. The selection, based on highest–ranked
attribute (Physical attributes), would be Model B. Because all alternatives meet
at least one acceptability range, no models are rejected.
Additive weighting:
For model fee, Rating =WorstOutcome – EvalutedOutcome
WorstOutcome – BestOutcome
For other attributes, Rating =EvaluatedOutcome – WorstOutcome
BestOutcome – WorstOutcome
The calculated dimensionless values are shown below.
Attributes Weight Normalized Weight Model A Model B Model C
Model fee 0.33 0.33/1.53 =0.2157 0.60 1.00 0.00
Disposition 0.18 0.18/1.53 =0.1176 0.00 1.00 0.71
Quality of shooting
portfolios 0.28 0.28/1.53 =0.1830 0.00 1.00 0.71
Physical attributes 0.48 0.48/1.53 =0.3137 0.50 1.00 0.00
Popularity 0.26 0.26/1.53 =0.1699 0.00 1.00 0.10
Total 1.53 1.00 1.10 5.00 1.53
Model A = (0.2157)(0.6) + (0.3137)(0.50)
=0.29
Model B = (0.2157)(1) + (0.1176)(1) + (0.1830)(1) + (0.3137)(1) + (0.1699)(1)