29) When using simulation to analyze a large capital project, the decision rule is
A) there is no clear cut decision rule, but the probabilities will produce a more informed
decision.
B) accept the project if the probability of a positive NPV is greater than 50%.
C) reject the project if the probability of a negative NPV is greater than 5%.
D) reject the project if the probability of a negative NPV is greater than 16%
Question Status: Previous edition
Objective: 13.2 Use sensitivity, scenario and simulation analyses to investigate the determinants of
project cash lows.
Keywords: simulation analysis
Principles: Principle 2: There Is a Risk–Return Tradeof
30) Cranston Plastic Packaging Solutions has run a simulation on a large project to produce
eco-friendly packaging for personal hygiene products. The mean NPV is an impressive
$8,000,000, but there is a 16% probability of a negative NPV and a 5% probability of an
NPV worse than ($6,000,000).
A) Cranston should reject the project. It is too risky.
B) Cranston should accept the project. The odds are in their favor.
C) Cranston should explore options to reduce the likelihood of very unfavorable outcomes.
D) Cranston should change the probabilities used in the simulation to reduce the likelihood
of a negative NPV.
Question Status: Previous edition
Objective: 13.2 Use sensitivity, scenario and simulation analyses to investigate the determinants of
project cash lows.
Keywords: simulation analysis
Principles: Principle 2: There Is a Risk–Return Tradeof
31) Natick Nurseries has used scenario analysis to evaluate the purchase of a former dairy
to use for nursery stock. The best case scenario produced a very favorable NPV of
$4,000,000; the NPV of the most likely case was $2,000,000, but the worst case scenario
resulted in an NPV of $(3,000,000) which would bring the company close to bankruptcy.
Natick could improve its decision by
A) using sensitivity analysis.
B) using simulation analysis.
C) simply accepting the best case scenario and rejecting the other outcomes.
D) weighting the favorable scenarios more heavily to increase the expected NPV.
Question Status: Previous edition
Objective: 13.2 Use sensitivity, scenario and simulation analyses to investigate the determinants of
project cash lows.
Keywords: simulation analysis
Principles: Principle 2: There Is a Risk–Return Tradeof
15