2. Decreases integration costs by providing an alternative to customized point-to-point interface application
programming
3. Improves data quality because of data mapping and consistent use of terms
4. Allows clients to select the best system for their needs
5. Preserves institutional investment in existing systems
6. Simplifies the administration of health care data processing
7. Simplifies systems integration efforts
8. Shortens the time required for integration
9. Improves management of care, the financial tracking of care rendered, and efficacy of treatment
Rationale 2: 1. Improves timeliness and availability of critical administrative and clinical data
2. Decreases integration costs by providing an alternative to customized point-to-point interface application
programming
3. Improves data quality because of data mapping and consistent use of terms
4. Allows clients to select the best system for their needs
5. Preserves institutional investment in existing systems
6. Simplifies the administration of health care data processing
7. Simplifies systems integration efforts
8. Shortens the time required for integration
9. Improves management of care, the financial tracking of care rendered, and efficacy of treatment
Rationale 3: 1. Improves timeliness and availability of critical administrative and clinical data
2. Decreases integration costs by providing an alternative to customized point-to-point interface application
programming
3. Improves data quality because of data mapping and consistent use of terms
4. Allows clients to select the best system for their needs
5. Preserves institutional investment in existing systems
6. Simplifies the administration of health care data processing
7. Simplifies systems integration efforts
8. Shortens the time required for integration
9. Improves management of care, the financial tracking of care rendered, and efficacy of treatment
Rationale 4: 1. Improves timeliness and availability of critical administrative and clinical data
2. Decreases integration costs by providing an alternative to customized point-to-point interface application
programming
3. Improves data quality because of data mapping and consistent use of terms
4. Allows clients to select the best system for their needs
5. Preserves institutional investment in existing systems
6. Simplifies the administration of health care data processing
7. Simplifies systems integration efforts
8. Shortens the time required for integration
9. Improves management of care, the financial tracking of care rendered, and efficacy of treatment
Rationale 5: 1. Improves timeliness and availability of critical administrative and clinical data
2. Decreases integration costs by providing an alternative to customized point-to-point interface application
programming
Hebda, Handbook of Informatics, 5/e Test Bank
Copyright 2012 by Pearson Education, Inc.