Power distance refers to how different societies handle the issue of human inequality, and sheds light on
the inherent power structure within organizations and teams. Some cultures are higher in power
distance, preferring autocracy, while other cultures are lower in power distance, fostering more
collaborative teamwork and less hierarchical structures. Consequently, differences in power distance can
pose serious challenges for managing global project teams.
The degree of uncertainty avoidance helps in understanding the risk–taking nature of a culture. From a
project team perspective, this might result in team members from some cultures being more cautious; this
can be particularly troublesome when some team members, due to high levels of uncertainty avoidance,
are not eager to adopt new technologies or techniques.
Individualism/collectivism reflects the extent to which a society values the position of an individual
versus the position of a group. In societies that are collectivist, peer pressure often plays an important
role in shaping group interaction and decision making. Mixing both individually– and
collectively–oriented individuals on a team can often cause excessive conflict if not carefully managed.
Masculinity/femininity refers to the degree to which a society is characterized by masculine qualities,
such as assertiveness, or by feminine characteristics, such as nurturance, which can have important
implications in terms of user preferences for technology, how user requirements are collected, or how
teams assign roles and collaborate.
The concept of time can also differ across cultures, with some cultures having a relatively longer–term
orientation, reflecting an appreciation for future rewards, perseverance, and long–term planning. On the
other hand, cultures with shorter–term orientation focus on the past and the current situation. Clearly,
time orientation differences can greatly influence project planning, task assignments, and overall team
performance.
Life focus, contrasts the extent to which a culture focuses on the quantity versus the quality of life. A
quantity of life orientation reflects a more competitive culture that values achievements and the
acquisition of material goods. A quality of life orientation values relationships, interdependence, and
concern for others. Life focus differences can influence group development, task and role assignments, as
well as reward preferences among team members.
Trait theories of leadership focus on identifying the traits, or personal attributes, of leaders. These trait
theories of leadership believe that personality, appearance, competency, and other personal
characteristics differentiate leaders from non–leaders. This research has found that successful leaders
often share some similar personal attributes, including:
·Intelligence and competency in task and organizational activities
·Maturity and a broad range of interests
·Considerate interpersonal skills and respect for the needs and differences of others
·Goal–oriented focus and a strong motivation to achieve success
Although the trait–focused research has been useful for identifying characteristics of leaders, it has failed
to identify why people become leaders or how people can be better leaders. Additionally, it has been
found that people can possess the traits of leaders, but this alone does not guarantee success.
Nonetheless, what can be concluded from this research is that when you find a person who emerges as a
leader, they are much more likely to possess the common set of personal attributes of intelligence,
maturity, a consideration for others, and a goal–orientated focus.