978-0078025761 Chapter 19 Part 1

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 122
subject Words 19916
subject Authors Barbara Chiappetta, John Wild, Ken Shaw

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
Chapter 19
Variable Costing and Analysis
True / False Questions
1. Product costs consist of direct labor, direct materials, and overhead.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Product Costs
2. Manufacturing overhead costs are those that can be traced directly to the
product.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Product Costs
3. The traditional costing approach assigns all manufacturing costs to products.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Product Costs
19-1
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
4. Absorption costing is required under GAAP.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
5. The use of absorption costing can result in misleading product cost information.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
6. Variable costing treats 'xed overhead cost as a period cost.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
7. The biggest problems with producing too much are lost sales and customer
dissatisfaction.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Production levels
19-2
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
8. Many companies link manager bonuses to income computed under absorption
costing because this is how income is reported to shareholders.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
9. Under absorption costing, a company had the following unit costs when 10,000
units were produced:
Direct labor $2 per unit
Direct material $3 per unit
Variable overhead $4 per unit
Total variable $9 per unit
Fixed overhead ($50,000/10,000 units) $5 per unit
Total production cost $14 per unit
The total product cost per unit under absorption costing if 25,000 units had been
produced would be $11.
TRUE
$2 DL + $3 DM + $4 VOH + ($50,000/25,000) FOH = $11
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-3
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
10. Assume a company had the following production costs:
Direct labor $2 per unit
Direct material $3 per unit
Variable overhead $4 per unit
Total variable $9 per unit
Fixed overhead ($50,000/10,000 units) $5 per unit
Total production cost $14 per unit
Under absorption costing, the total product cost per unit when 4,000 units are
produced would be $22.50.
FALSE
($20,000 + $30,000 + $40,000 + $50,000)/4,000 = $35 per unit
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
11. When the number of units produced is equal to the number of units sold, net
income reported under variable costing is identical to net income reported under
absorption costing.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Comparing Variable Costing and Absorption Costing
12. When there are zero units in Beginning Finished Goods Inventory and the units
produced are more than the units sold, the income will be lower under variable
costing than under absorption costing.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 1 Easy
19-4
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Comparing Variable Costing and Absorption Costing
13. Variable costing is required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for
financial statement purposes.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-C1 Describe how absorption costing can result in overproduction.
Topic: Variable Costing
14. Since 'xed costs remain constant in the short run, special orders should be
accepted as long as the order price is greater than the variable costs.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P4 Determine product selling price based on absorption costing.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
15. For short-term pricing decisions, absorption costing is an appropriate costing
method to use.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P4 Determine product selling price based on absorption costing.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
16. When setting long-term sales prices for products, the sales price must cover all
costs, including 'xed costs.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P4 Determine product selling price based on absorption costing.
19-5
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Topic: Determine product selling prices
17. Evaluating and rewarding managers based on absorption basis income can lead to
overproduction.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Production levels
18. Cost information from both absorption costing and variable costing can aid
managers in pricing.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P4 Determine product selling price based on absorption costing.
Topic: Determine product selling prices
19. Managers should accept special orders provided the special order price exceeds
the product cost per unit under absorption costing.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
20. Absorption costing is useful because it reBects the full costs that sales must
exceed for the company to be profitable.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-6
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
21. The traditional income statement format used for financial reporting is called the
contribution margin format.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
22. If a company has excess capacity, increases in production level will increase
variable production costs but not 'xed production costs.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Production levels
23. Fixed costs change in the short run depending upon management's decision to
accept or reject special orders.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
24. Variable costing separates the variable costs from 'xed costs and therefore makes
it easier to identify and assign control over costs.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-7
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
25. A company normally sells a product for $20 per unit. Variable per unit costs for this
product are: $2 direct materials, $4 direct labor, and $1.50 variable overhead. The
company is currently operating at 70% of capacity producing 14,000 units per
year. Total 'xed costs are $42,000 per year. The company should not accept a
special order for 2,000 units which would be sold for $10 per unit because there
would be an incremental loss on the order.
FALSE
14,000/.7 - 14,000 = 6,000 unit capacity remaining
Per unit variable costs = $2 DM + $4 DL + $1.50 VOH = $7.50
Per unit incremental income = $10.00 - $7.50 = $2.50
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
26. A company normally sells a product for $25 per unit. Variable per unit costs for this
product are: $3 direct materials, $5 direct labor, and $2 variable overhead. The
company is currently operating at 100% of capacity producing 30,000 units per
year. Total 'xed costs are $75,000 per year. The company should accept a special
order for 1,000 units which would be sold for $13 per unit because the special
order price exceeds variable costs.
FALSE
When a company is operating at full capacity, any special order whose selling price
is less than the existing business should be rejected.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
27. Absorption costing is usually used for internal management purposes, and variable
costing is usually used for external reporting purposes.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
19-8
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
page-pf9
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
28. Assuming 'xed costs remain constant, and a company produces and sells the
same number of units, then income under absorption costing is less than income
under variable costing.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Production levels
29. Assuming 'xed costs remain constant, and a company produces more units than it
sells, then income under absorption costing is less than income under variable
30. Assuming 'xed costs remain constant, and a company sells more units than it
produces, then income under absorption costing is less than income under
variable costing
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Production levels
19-9
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
31. The data needed for cost-volume-pro't analysis is readily available if the income
statement is prepared under absorption costing.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
32. The data needed for cost-volume-pro't analysis is readily available if the income
statement is prepared using a contribution format.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
33. Given the following data, total product cost per unit under variable costing is
$10.75.
Direct labor $7 per unit
Direct materials $1 per unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $20,000
Total 'xed overhead $90,000
Expected units to be produced 40,000 units
FALSE
$7 DL + $1 DM + ($20,000/40,000 units) VOH = $8.50
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-10
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
34. Given the following data, total product cost per unit under variable costing is
$7.09.
Direct labor $2.50 per
unit
Direct materials $1.75 per
unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $42,600
Total 'xed overhead $160,000
Expected units to be produced 15,000 units
TRUE
$2.50 DL + $1.75 DM + ($42,600/15,000 units) VOH = $7.09
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
35. Given the following data, total product cost per unit under variable costing will be
greater than total product cost under absorption costing.
Direct labor $2 per unit
Direct materials $8 per unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $37,500
Total 'xed overhead $249,000
Expected units to be produced 15,000 units
FALSE
Variable costing:
$2 DL + $8 DM + ($37,500/15,000 units) VOH = $12.50
Absorption costing:
$2 DL + $8 DM + ($37,500/15,000 units) VOH + ($249,000/15,000 units) FOH =
$29.10
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
19-11
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
36. Given the following data, total product cost per unit under absorption costing is
$9.14.
Direct labor $0.72 per
unit
Direct materials $0.80 per
unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $202,500
Total 'xed overhead $140,400
Expected units to be produced 45,000 units
TRUE
$0.72 DL + $0.80 DM + [($202,500 + 140,400)/45,000 units)] MOH = $9.14
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
37. Given the following data, total product cost per unit under absorption costing is
$11.40.
Direct labor $5 per unit
Direct materials $6 per unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $32,800
Total 'xed overhead $164,000
Expected units to be produced 82,000 units
FALSE
$5 DL + $6 DM + [($32,800 + 164,000)/82,000 units)] MOH = $13.40
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
19-12
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
38. Given the following data, total product cost per unit under absorption costing will
be greater than total product cost per unit under variable costing.
Direct labor $9 per unit
Direct materials $7 per unit
Overhead
Total variable
overhead
$45,000
Total 'xed overhead $27,000
Expected units to be
produced
9,000 units
TRUE
Variable costing: $9 DL + $7 DM + ($45,000/9,000 units) VOH = $21
Absorption costing: $9 DL + $7 DM + ($45,000/9,000 units) VOH + ($27,000/9,000
units) FOH = $24
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Product Costs
39. Given the following data, total product cost per unit under absorption costing will
be $400 greater than total product cost per unit under variable costing.
Direct labor $1.50 per
unit
Direct materials $1.50 per
unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $900,000
Total 'xed overhead $1,200,000
Expected units to be produced 3,000 units
TRUE
$1,200,000/3,000 = $400 per unit more because of 'xed overhead.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
19-13
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Comparing Variable Costing and Absorption Costing
40. The variable costing income statement classi'es costs based on cost behavior
rather than function.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
41. Contribution margin is another way to refer to gross margin.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
42. Under a traditional income statement format, prepared using absorption costing,
expenses are grouped according to cost behavior.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
43. A variable costing income statement focuses attention on the relationship between
costs and sales that is not evident from the absorption costing format.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
19-14
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
44. When units produced equal units sold, reported income is identical under
absorption costing and variable costing.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
Topic: Variable Costing
45. Sales less total variable costs equals manufacturing margin.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
46. When units produced exceed the units sold, income under absorption costing is
higher than income under variable costing.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-15
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
47. When units produced are less than units sold, income under absorption costing is
higher than income under variable costing.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
48. Income under absorption costing will always be diHerent than income under
variable costing.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
49. Reporting contribution margin by market segment is useful in assessing the
pro'tability of each segment.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
50. Contribution margin is the excess of sales over total variable costs.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
19-16
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Topic: Variable Costing
51. Variable costing is the only acceptable basis for both external reporting and tax
reporting.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
52. The bottom line of a contribution margin report is net income.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
53. Variable costing results in expensing of 'xed manufacturing overhead based on
the number of units produced.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
54. Absorption costing results in expensing of 'xed manufacturing overhead based on
the number of units produced, rather than units sold.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
19-17
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
55. When the number of units produced exceeds the number of units sold, absorption
costing defers some of the 'xed costs incurred.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Absorption Costing
56. Information presented in a variable costing format can assist management when
making short-term pricing decisions.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P4 Determine product selling price based on absorption costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
57. It is not possible to convert reports prepared using variable costing to absorption
costing reports.
FALSE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
58. To convert variable costing income to absorption costing income, management will
need to add 'xed overhead cost deferred in ending inventory and subtract 'xed
overhead cost recognized from beginning inventory.
TRUE
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
19-18
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
Multiple Choice Questions
59. Which of the following costing methods charges all manufacturing costs to its
products?
A. Direct
costing
B. ABC
costing
C. Variable
costing
D. Absorption
costing
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Product Costs
60. Which of the following is not considered a product cost?
A. Direct
materials.
B. Research and development
costs.
C. Direct
labor.
D. Inventoriable
costs.
E. Indirect manufacturing
costs.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 2 Medium
19-19
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Product Costs
61. Using a traditional costing approach, which of the following manufacturing costs
are assigned to products?
A. Direct materials and direct
labor.
B. Direct labor and variable manufacturing
overhead.
C. Fixed manufacturing overhead, direct materials, and
direct labor.
D. Variable manufacturing overhead, direct materials, and
direct labor.
E. Variable manufacturing overhead, direct materials, direct labor, and 'xed
manufacturing overhead.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
62. Which of the following statements is true regarding absorption costing?
A. It is not the traditional costing
approach.
B. It is not permitted to be used for financial
reporting.
C. It is not permitted to be used for tax
reporting.
D. It assigns all manufacturing costs to
products.
E. It requires only variable costs to be treated as
product costs.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-20
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
63. Which of the following statements is true regarding variable costing?
A. It is a traditional costing
approach.
B. Only manufacturing costs that change in total with changes in production level
are included in product costs.
C. It is not permitted to be used for managerial
reporting.
D. It treats overhead in the same manner as absorption
costing.
E. It makes it easier to manipulate earnings with changes in
production levels.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
64. Which of the following statements is true?
A. Variable costing treats 'xed overhead as a
period cost.
B. Absorption costing treats 'xed overhead as a
period cost.
C. Absorption costing treats fixed overhead as an expense in the period it
is incurred.
D. Variable costing excludes all overhead from
product costs.
E. Managers can manipulate earnings more easily under variable costing by
varying the production level.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Comparing Variable Costing and Absorption Costing
19-21
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
65. Which of the following would be a line item for a variable costing income
statement?
A. Gross
margin
B. Cost of goods available for
sale
C. Total cost of goods
sold
D. Contribution
margin
E. Work-in-process
inventory
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
66. Which of the following statements is true?
A. Under variable costing, direct materials and direct labor are expensed as
period expenses.
B. Under variable costing, 'xed manufacturing overhead is expensed as period
expenses.
C. Fixed manufacturing overhead costs are treated the same under both
absorption costing and variable costing.
D. Reported income under absorption costing is not aHected by production
level changes.
E. Under absorption costing, fixed manufacturing overhead is expensed as period
expenses.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Product Costs
19-22
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
67. Under absorption costing, which of the following statements is not true?
A. Over production and inventory buildup can occur because of how managers are
evaluated and rewarded.
B. The 'xed costs per unit decline as more units are
produced.
C. Variable inventory costs are treated in the same manner as they are under
variable costing.
D. Fixed inventory costs are treated in the same manner as they are under
variable costing.
E. All manufacturing costs are assigned to
products.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
68. When the number of units sold exceed the number of units produced, income
reported under absorption costing will be lower under absorption than under
variable costing. Which of the following gives the best justification of the above
statement?
A. Income under absorption costing is always less than income reported using
variable costing, regardless of the number of units produced.
B. Income under absorption costing is always more than income reported using
variable costing, regardless of the number of units produced.
C. The 'xed overhead cost deferred in ending inventory is greater than the 'xed
overhead cost recognized from beginning inventory.
D. The fixed overhead cost deferred in ending inventory is less than the fixed
overhead cost recognized from beginning inventory.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-23
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
69. Mentor Corp. has provided the following information for the current year:
Units produced 3,500 units
Sale price $200 per unit
Direct materials $70 per unit
Direct labor $55 per unit
Variable manufacturing
overhead $20 per unit
Fixed manufacturing
overhead
$350,000 per
year
Variable selling and
administrative costs $30 per unit
Fixed selling and
administrative costs
$150,000 per
year
Calculate the unit product cost using absorption costing.
A. $24
5
B. $27
5
C. $5
5
D. $14
5
Absorption
Costing
Direct materials 70
Direct labor 55
Variable manufacturing overhead 20
Fixed manufacturing overhead ($350,000 ÷
3,500 units) 100
Total unit product cost $245
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-24
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
70. Mentor Corp. has provided the following information for the current year:
Units produced 3,500 units
Sale price $200 per unit
Direct materials $70 per unit
Direct labor $55 per unit
Variable manufacturing overhead $20 per unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead $350,000 per year
Variable selling and administrative costs $30 per unit
Fixed selling and administrative costs $150,000 per year
Calculate the unit product cost using variable costing.
A. $24
5
B. $27
5
C. $5
5
D. $14
5
Variable Costing
Direct materials 70
Direct labor 55
Variable manufacturing overhead 20
Total unit product cost $145
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-25
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
71. Under absorption costing, a company had the following unit costs when 9,000
units were produced.
Direct labor $7.25 per unit
Direct material $8.00 per unit
Variable overhead $5.50 per unit
Fixed overhead ($67,500/9,000 units) $7.50 per unit
Total production cost $28.25 per unit
Compute the total production cost per unit under absorption costing if 25,000
units had been produced.
A. $28.2
5
B. $23.4
5
C. $26.2
5
D. $20.7
5
E. $15.2
5
$7.25 DL + $8 DM + $5.50 VOH + ($67,500/25,000) FOH = $23.45
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-26
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
72. Under absorption costing, a company had the following unit costs when 9,000
units were produced.
Direct labor $7.25 per unit
Direct material $8.00 per unit
Variable overhead $5.50 per unit
Fixed overhead ($67,500/9,000 units) $7.50 per unit
Total production cost $28.25 per unit
Compute the total production cost per unit under variable costing if 30,000 units
had been produced.
A. $31.7
5
B. $28.2
5
C. $23.4
5
D. $15.2
5
E. $20.7
5
$7.25 DL + $8 DM + $5.50 VOH = $20.75
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-27
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
73. Under absorption costing, a company had the following unit costs when 8,000
units were produced.
Direct labor $8.50 per unit
Direct material $9.00 per unit
Variable overhead $6.75 per unit
Fixed overhead ($60,000/8,000 units) $7.50 per unit
Total production cost $31.75 per unit
Compute the total production cost per unit under variable costing if 25,000 units
had been produced.
A. $31.7
5
B. $27.2
5
C. $26.2
5
D. $24.2
5
E. $17.5
0
$8.50 DL + $9 DM + $6.75 VOH = $24.25
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
74. When evaluating a special order, management should:
A. Only accept the order if the incremental revenue exceeds all
product costs.
B. Only accept the order if the incremental revenue exceeds 'xed
product costs.
C. Only accept the order if the incremental revenue exceeds total variable
product costs.
D. Only accept the order if the incremental revenue exceeds full absorption
product costs.
E. Only accept the order if the incremental revenue exceeds regular
sales revenue.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
19-28
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
75. A company is currently operating at 80% capacity producing 5,000 units. Current
cost information relating to this production is shown in the table below:
Per Unit
Sales price $34
Direct material $2
Direct labor $3
Variable overhead $4
Fixed overhead $5
The company has been approached by a customer with a request for a 100-unit
special order. What is the minimum per unit sales price that management would
accept for this order if the company wishes to increase current profit?
A. Any amount over $34 per
unit.
B. Any amount over $20 per
unit.
C. Any amount over $14 per
unit.
D. Any amount over $9 per
unit.
E. Any amount over $5 per
unit.
5,000/.80 - 5,000 = 1,250 unit capacity available
$2 + $3 + $4 = $9 incremental costs
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
19-29
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
76. A company is currently operating at 75% capacity and producing 3,000 units.
Current cost information relating to this production is shown in the table below:
Per Unit
Sales price $43
Direct material $7
Direct labor $6
Variable overhead $4
Fixed overhead $4
The company has been approached by a customer with a request for a 200-unit
special. What is the minimum per unit sales price that management would accept
for this order if the company wishes to increase current pro'ts?
A. Any amount over $43 per
unit.
B. Any amount over $17 per
unit.
C. Any amount over $21 per
unit.
D. Any amount over $13 per
unit.
E. Any amount over $22 per
unit.
3,000/.75 - 3,000 = 1,000 unit capacity remaining
$7 + $6 + $4 = $17 incremental costs
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
19-30
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
77. Geneva Company manufactures dolls that are sold to various customers. The
companyworks at full capacity for half the year to meet peak demand, and
operates at 80% capacity for the other half of the year. The following information is
provided:
Units produced and sold 600,000 units
Selling price $35/unit
Variable manufacturing costs $20/unit
Fixed manufacturing costs $1,200,000/yr.
Variable selling and administrative costs $6/unit
Fixed selling and administrative costs $950,000/yr
Geneva receives a purchase order to make 5,000 dolls as a one-time event. The
good news is that this order is during a period when Geneva does have excess
capacity. What is the lowest selling price Geneva should accept for this purchase
order?
A. $35.0
0
B. $26.0
0
C. $29.5
0
D. $23.5
0
Variable manufacturing costs per unit + Variable selling and administrative costs
per unit = $20 + $6 = $26.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
19-31
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
78. Which of the following best describes costs assigned to the product under the
absorption costing method?
Direct labor (DL)
Direct materials (DM)
Variable selling and administrative
Variable manufacturing overhead
Fixed selling and administrative
Fixed manufacturing overhead
A. DL, DM, variable selling and administrative costs, and variable
manufacturing overhead.
B. DL, DM, and variable manufacturing
overhead.
C. DL, DM, variable manufacturing overhead, and fixed manufacturing
overhead.
D. DL and
DM.
E. DL, DM, 'xed selling and administrative, and 'xed manufacturing
overhead.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-32
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
79. Which of the following best describes costs assigned to the product under the
variable costing method?
Direct labor (DL)
Direct materials (DM)
Variable selling and administrative
Variable manufacturing overhead
Fixed selling and administrative
Fixed manufacturing overhead
A. DL, DM, variable selling and administrative costs, and variable
manufacturing overhead.
B. DL, DM, and variable manufacturing
overhead.
C. DL, DM, variable manufacturing overhead, and 'xed manufacturing
overhead.
D. DL and
DM.
E. DL, DM, 'xed selling and administrative, and 'xed manufacturing
overhead.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
80. Income __________ when there is zero beginning inventory and all inventory units
produced are sold.
A. Will be lower under variable costing than absorption
costing
B. Will be the same under both variable and absorption
costing
C. Will be higher under variable costing than absorption
costing
D. Will be higher than gross margin under variable
costing
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-33
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
81. During its first year of operations, the McCormick Company incurred the following
manufacturing costs: Direct materials, $5 per unit, Direct labor, $3 per unit,
Variable overhead, $4 per unit, and Fixed overhead, $250,000. The company
produced 25,000 units, and sold 20,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in inventory at
year-end. What is the value of ending inventory under absorption costing?
A. $60,00
0
B. $110,00
0
C. $50,00
0
D. $250,00
0
$$5 + $3 + $4 + ($250,000/25,000 units) = $22 per unit × 5,000 units =
$110,000.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
82. During its first year of operations, the McCormick Company incurred the following
manufacturing costs: Direct materials, $5 per unit, Direct labor, $3 per unit,
Variable overhead, $4 per unit, and Fixed overhead, $250,000. The company
produced 25,000 units, and sold 20,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in inventory at
year-end. What is the value of ending inventory under variable costing?
A. $60,00
0
B. $110,00
0
C. $50,00
0
D. $250,00
0
$5 + $3 + $4 = $12 per unit × 5,000 units = $60,000.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
19-34
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
83. During its first year of operations, the McCormick Company incurred the following
manufacturing costs: Direct materials, $5 per unit, Direct labor, $3 per unit,
Variable overhead, $4 per unit, and Fixed overhead, $250,000. The company
produced 25,000 units, and sold 20,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in inventory at
year-end. Income calculated under variable costing is determined to be $315,000.
How much income is reported under absorption costing?
A. $315,00
0
B. $265,00
0
C. $565,00
0
D. $365,00
0
Income under absorption costing = Income under variable costing + Fixed
overhead cost in ending inventory - Fixed overhead cost in beginning inventory.
$315,000 + $50,000 - $0 = $365,000.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
84. Special order decisions should be made using variable costing because:
A. Special order decisions usually focus on 'xed
costs
B. Variable costing includes all overhead costs in the calculation of
product costs.
C. Only variable costs will increase as a result of the
special order.
D. All costs, including variable and fixed costs, must be covered by the special
order pricing.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
19-35
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
85. Shore Company reports the following information regarding its production cost.
Units produced 28,000 units
Direct labor $23 per unit
Direct materials $24 per unit
Variable overhead $280,000 in total
Fixed overhead $94,920 in total
Compute production cost per unit under absorption costing.
A. $57.0
0
B. $60.3
9
C. $47.0
0
D. $23.0
0
E. $24.0
0
$23 DL + $24 DM + ($280,000/28,000) VOH + ($94,920/28,000) FOH = $60.39
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-36
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
86. Urban Company reports the following information regarding its production cost:
Units produced 20,000 units
Direct labor $13 per unit
Direct materials $18 per unit
Variable overhead $220,000 per unit
Fixed overhead $110,000 in total
Compute production cost per unit under variable costing.
A. $18.0
0
B. $36.5
0
C. $42.0
0
D. $13.0
0
E. $31.0
0
$13 DL + $18 DM + ($220,000/20,000) VOH = $42.00
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-37
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
87. Hayes Inc. provided the following information for the year 2015:
Beginning inventory 100 units
Units produced 750 units
Units sold 800 units
Selling price $150/unit
Direct materials $35/unit
Direct labor $16/unit
Variable manufacturing overhead $15/unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead $24,000/yr
Variable selling/administrative costs $8/unit
Fixed selling/administrative costs $15,500/yr
What is the unit product cost for the year using absorption costing?
A. $9
8
B. $6
6
C. $7
4
D. $9
6
Direct materials $35
Direct labor 16
Fixed manufacturing overhead 32 ($24,000/750 units)
Variable manufacturing overhead 15
Total unit product cost $98
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-38
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
88. Hayes Inc. provided the following information for the year 2015:
Beginning inventory 100 units
Units produced 750 units
Units sold 800 units
Selling price $150/unit
Direct materials $35/unit
Direct labor $16/unit
Variable manufacturing overhead $15/unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead $24,000/yr
Variable selling/administrative costs $8/unit
Fixed selling/administrative costs $15,500/yr
What is the unit product cost for the year using variable costing?
A. $9
8
B. $6
6
C. $7
4
D. $9
6
Direct materials $35
Direct labor 16
Variable manufacturing overhead 15
Total unit product cost $66
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-39
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
89. Sea Company reports the following information regarding its production cost.
Units produced 42,000 units
Direct labor $35 per unit
Direct materials $28 per unit
Variable overhead $17 per unit
Fixed overhead $105,000 in total
Compute the product cost per unit under variable costing.
A. $28.0
0
B. $82.5
0
C. $80.0
0
D. $63.0
0
E. $35.0
0
$35 DL + $28 DM + $17 VOH = $80
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-40
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
90. Sea Company reports the following information regarding its production costs:
Units produced 42,000 units
Direct labor $35 per unit
Direct materials $28 per unit
Variable overhead $17 per unit
Fixed overhead $105,000 in total
Compute the product cost per unit under absorption costing.
A. $28.0
0
B. $82.5
0
C. $80.0
0
D. $63.0
0
E. $35.0
0
$35 DL + $28 DM + $17 VOH + ($105,000/42,000) FOH = $82.50
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-41
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Advanced Company reports the following information for the current year. All
beginning inventory amounts equaled $0 this year.
Units produced this year 25,000 units
Units sold this year 15,000 units
Direct materials $9 per unit
Direct labor $11 per unit
Variable overhead $75,000 in total
Fixed overhead $137,500 in total
91. Given Advanced Company's data, compute cost per unit of finished goods under
variable costing.
A. $20.0
0
B. $25.0
0
C. $21.8
8
D. $23.0
0
E. $28.5
0
$9 DM + $11 DL + ($75,000/25,000) VOH = $23
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-42
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
92. Given Advanced Company's data, compute cost per unit of finished goods under
absorption costing.
A. $20.0
0
B. $34.1
7
C. $25.3
2
D. $23.0
0
E. $28.5
0
$9 DM + $11 DL + ($75,000/25,000) VOH + ($137,500/25,000) FOH = $28.50
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
93. Given Advanced Company's data, compute cost of finished goods in inventory
under absorption costing.
A. $285,00
0
B. $712,50
0
C. $427,50
0
D. $230,00
0
E. $345,00
0
$9 DM + $11 DL + ($75,000/25,000) VOH + ($137,500/25,000) FOH = $28.50 per
unit cost
25,000 units -15,000 units = 10,000 units in ending inventory
10,000 units × $28.50 = $285,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
19-43
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
94. Given Advanced Company's data, compute cost of finished goods in inventory
under variable costing.
A. $285,00
0
B. $712,50
0
C. $427,50
0
D. $230,00
0
E. $345,00
0
$9 DM + $11 DL + ($75,000/25,000) VOH = $23
25,000 units -15,000 units = 10,000 units in ending inventory
10,000 units × $23 = $230,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
95. Given Advanced Company's data, and the knowledge that the product is sold for
$50 per unit and operating expenses are $200,000, compute the net income under
absorption costing.
A. $55,00
0
B. $67,50
0
C. $80,50
0
D. $122,50
0
E. $205,00
0
NI = ($50 - $28.50)(15,000 units) - $200,000 = $122,500
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
19-44
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
96. Given Advanced Company's data, and the knowledge that the product is sold for
$50 per unit and operating expenses are $200,000, compute the net income under
variable costing.
A. $55,00
0
B. $67,50
0
C. $80,50
0
D. $122,50
0
E. $205,00
0
NI = ($50 - $23.00)(15,000 units) - $200,000 - $137,500 = $67,500
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-45
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
97. Clear Company reports the following information for its first year of operations:
Units produced this year 50,000 units
Units sold this year 49,000 units
Direct materials $7 per unit
Direct labor $3 per unit
Variable overhead $210,000 in total
Fixed overhead ? in total
If the company's cost per unit of finished goods using absorption costing is
$19.30, what is total 'xed overhead?
A. $350,00
0
B. $255,00
0
C. $150,00
0
D. $249,90
0
E. $147,00
0
$19.30 = DM + DL + VOH + FOH
$19.30 = $7 + $3 + ($210,000/50,000) + FOH
$19.30 = $14.20 + FOH
FOH = $5.10 per unit
$5.10 per unit × 50,000 units = $255,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-46
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
98. Milton Company reports the following information for the current year:
Units produced this year 45,000 units
Units sold this year 53,000 units
Direct materials $5 per unit
Direct labor $2 per unit
Variable overhead $270,000 in total
Fixed overhead ? in total
If the company's cost per unit of finished goods using absorption costing is $18,
what is total 'xed overhead?
A. $225,00
0
B. $180,00
0
C. $270,00
0
D. $315,00
0
E. $720,00
0
$18 = DM + DL + VOH + FOH
$18 = $5 + $2 + ($270,000/45,000) + FOH
$18 = $13 + FOH
FOH = $5 per unit
$5 per unit × 45,000 units = $225,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-47
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
99. Gage Company reports the following information for its first year of operations:
Units produced this year 7,000 units
Units sold this year 6,500 units
Direct materials $22 per unit
Direct labor $30 per unit
Variable overhead ? in total
Fixed overhead $56,000 in total
If the company's cost per unit of finished goods using variable costing is $63,
what is total variable overhead?
A. $21,00
0
B. $71,50
0
C. $77,00
0
D. $19,50
0
E. $16,59
0
$63 = DM + DL + VOH
$63 = $22 + $30 + VOH
VOH = $11 per unit
$11 per unit × 7,000 units = $77,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-48
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
100. A company reports the following information for its first year of operations:
Units produced this year 650 units
Units sold this year 500 units
Direct materials $750 per unit
Direct labor $1,000 per unit
Variable overhead ? in total
Fixed overhead $308,750 in total
If the company's cost per unit of finished goods using variable costing is $2,375,
what is total variable overhead?
A. $237,50
0
B. $75,00
0
C. $312,50
0
D. $406,25
0
E. $97,50
0
$2,375 = DM + DL + VOH
$2,375 = $750 + $1,000 + VOH
VOH = $625 per unit
$625 per unit × 650 units = $406,250
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-49
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
101. Magenta Inc. reports the following information for the current year, which is its first
year of operations:
Units produced this year 750,000 units
Units sold this year 740,000 units
Direct materials $18.30 per unit
Direct labor $14.20 per unit
Variable overhead ? in total
Fixed overhead $4,500,000 in total
If the company's cost per unit of finished goods using absorption costing is
$39.75, what is total variable overhead?
A. $925,00
0
B. $877,50
0
C. $937,50
0
D. $865,80
0
E. $5,437,5
00
$39.75 = DM + DL + VOH + FOH
$39.75 = $18.30 + $14.20 + VOH + ($4,500,000/750,000)
$39.75 = $38.50 + VOH
VOH = $1.25 per unit
$1.25 per unit × 750,000 units = $937,500
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-50
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
102. A company reports the following information for its first year of operations:
Units produced this year 43,000 units
Units sold this year 39,000 units
Direct materials $0.57 per unit
Direct labor $0.83 per unit
Variable overhead $26,660 in total
Fixed overhead ? in total
If the company's cost per unit of finished goods using variable costing is $2.02,
what is the amount of total 'xed overhead?
A. $26,66
0
B. $35,69
0
C. $24,51
0
D. Some other
amount
E. Cannot be determined from the given
data.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-51
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
103. A company reports the following information for its first year of operations:
Units produced this year ? units
Units sold this year 1,500 units
Direct materials $9 per unit
Direct labor $5 per unit
Variable overhead $7 per unit
Fixed overhead $24,000 in total
If the company's cost per unit of finished goods using absorption costing is $27,
how many units were produced?
A. 4,000
units.
B. 3,600
units.
C. 1,846
units.
D. 2,667
units.
E. 2,000
units.
$27 = DM + DL + VOH + FOH
$27 = $9 + $5 + $7 + FOH
FOH = $6 per unit
$6 per unit × units produced = $24,000
Units produced = 4,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-52
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
104. Accurate Metal Company sold 32,000 units of its product at a price of $250 per
unit. Total variable cost per unit is $155, consisting of $145 in variable production
cost and $5 in variable selling and administrative cost. Compute the
manufacturing margin for the company under variable costing.
A. $8,000,0
00
B. $4,960,0
00
C. $4,800,0
00
D. $3,360,0
00
E. $3,200,0
00
($250 - $145 × 32,000 units = $$3,360,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Manufacturing Margin
105. Chance, Inc. sold 3,000 units of its product at a price of $72 per unit. Total variable
cost per unit is $51, consisting of $32 in variable production cost and $19 in
variable selling and administrative cost. Compute the manufacturing margin for
the company under variable costing.
A. $96,00
0
B. $63,00
0
C. $120,00
0
D. $216,00
0
E. ($90,00
0)
($72 - $32) × 3,000 units = $120,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
19-53
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Manufacturing Margin
106. Vision Tester, Inc., a manufacturer of optical glass, began operations on February 1
of the current year. During this time, the company produced 900,000 units and
sold 800,000 units at a sales price of $12 per unit. Cost information for this year is
shown in the following table:
Production costs
Direct materials $0.80 per unit
Direct labor $0.70 per unit
Variable overhead $500,000 in
total
Fixed overhead $450,000 in
total
Non-production costs
Variable selling and
administrative
$30,000 in
total
Fixed selling and
administrative
$490,000 in
total
Given this information, which of the following is true?
A. Net income under variable costing will exceed net income under absorption
costing by $50,000.
B. Net income under absorption costing will exceed net income under variable
costing by $50,000.
C. Net income will be the same under both absorption and
variable costing.
D. Net income under variable costing will exceed net income under absorption
costing by $60,000.
E. Net income under absorption costing will exceed net income under variable
costing by $60,000.
100,000 units × ($450,000/900,000 FOH) = $50,000 inventoried under absorption
and expensed under variable costing.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P4 Determine product selling price based on absorption costing.
19-54
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
Galaxy, Inc., a manufacturer of telescopes, began operations on June 1 of the
current year. During this time, the company produced 60,000units and sold 40,000
units at a sales price of $600 per unit. Cost information for this year is shown in
the following table:
Production costs
Direct materials $90 per unit
Direct labor $75 per unit
Variable overhead $240,000 in
total
Fixed overhead $420,000 in
total
Non-production costs
Variable selling and
administrative
$80,000 in
total
Fixed selling and
administrative
$520,000 in
total
107. Given the Galaxy, Inc. data, what is net income using absorption costing?
A. $11,275,0
00
B. $17,400,0
00
C. $16,360,0
00
D. $16,800,0
00
E. $16,220,0
00
Sales = $600 × 40,000 = $24,000,000
Cost of goods sold = $90 + $75 + ($240,000/60,000) + ($420,000/60,000) = $176
× 40,000 units = $7,040,000
Nonproduction costs = $80,000 + $520,000 = $600,000
Net income using absorption costing = $24,000,000 - $176(40,000) - $600,000 =
$16,360,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-55
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
108. Given the Galaxy Inc. data, what is net income using variable costing?
A. $16,220,0
00
B. $17,400,0
00
C. $16,360,0
00
D. $11,275,0
00
E. $16,800,0
00
Sales = $600 × 40,000 = $24,000,000
Cost of goods sold = $90 + $75 + ($240,000/60,000) = $169 × 40,000 units =
$6,760,000Other variable costs (nonproduction) = $80,000
Total 'xed costs = $420,000 (production overhead) + $520,000 (nonproduction) =
$940,000
Net income using variable costing = $24,000,000 - $169(40,000) - $80,000 -
$940,000 = $$16,220,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-56
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Scavenger Company, a manufacturer of recycling bins, began operations on
January 1 of the current year. During this time, the company produced 60,000
units and sold 55,000 units at a sales price of $15 per unit. Cost information for
this year is shown in the following table:
Production costs
Direct materials $2.50 per unit
Direct labor $3.00 per unit
Variable overhead $45,000 in
total
Fixed overhead $240,000 in
total
Non-production costs
Variable selling and
administrative
$10,000 in
total
Fixed selling and
administrative
$50,000 in
total
109. Given the Scavenger Company data, what is net income using absorption costing?
A. $201,25
0
B. $181,25
0
C. $150,00
0
D. $177,60
0
E. $276,25
0
Sales = $15(55,000) = $825,000
COGS = DM + DL + VOH + FOH
Variable overhead production costs per unit = $45,000/60,000 units = $0.75 per
unit
Fixed overhead production costs per unit = $240,000/60,000 units = $4.00 per
unit
[($2.50 + $3.00 + $0.75 + $4.00) × 55,000 units] = $563,750
Sales - COGS - non-production costs = Net Income
$825,000 - $563,750 - $10,000 - $50,000 = $201,250
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
19-57
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
110. Given the Scavenger Company data, what is net income using variable costing?
A. $201,25
0
B. $181,25
0
C. $150,00
0
D. $177,60
0
E. $276,25
0
Sales: $15(55,000) = $825,000
Variable COGS = DM + DL + VOH
Variable overhead production costs per unit = $45,000/60,000 units = $0.75 per
unit
[($2.50 + $3.00 + $0.75) × 55,000 units] = $343,750
Other variable costs (nonproduction) = $10,000
Total 'xed costs = $240,000 + $50,000 = $290,000
Sales - Variable COGS - Variable nonproduction cost - Fixed costs = Net income
$825,000 - $343,750 - $10,000 - $290,000 = $181,250
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-58
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
111. Brush Industries reports the following information for May:
Sales $900,00
0
Fixed cost of goods sold 100,000
Variable cost of goods sold 250,000
Fixed selling and administrative
costs 100,000
Variable selling and administrative
costs 125,000
Calculate the operating income for May under absorption costing?
A. $650,00
0
B. $325,00
0
C. $525,00
0
D. $550,00
0
Sales $900,000 - Cost of goods sold $350,000 = Gross margin $550,000 - Selling
and administrative costs $225,000 = $325,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-59
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Cool Pools, a manufacturer of above ground pools, began operations on January 1
of the current year. During this time, the company produced 45,000 units and sold
44,000 units at a sales price of $60 per unit. Cost information for this year is
shown in the following table:
Production costs
Direct materials $11.25 per
unit
Direct labor $3.20 per unit
Variable overhead $315,000 in
total
Fixed overhead $39,600 in
total
Non-production costs
Variable selling and
administrative
$2,000 in
total
Fixed selling and
administrative
$6,000 in
total
112. Given the Cool Pools Company data, what is net income using absorption costing?
A. $1,649,4
80
B. $1,648,6
00
C. $1,627,1
50
D. $1,709,4
80
E. $1,708,6
00
Sales = $60(44,000) = $2,640,000
Variable overhead production costs per unit = $315,000/45,000 units = $7 per unit
Fixed overhead production costs per unit = $39,600/45,000 units = $0.88 per unit
COGS = DM + DL + VOH + FOH
[($11.25 + $3.20 + $7.00 + $0.88) × 44,000 units] = $982,520
Sales - COGS - Nonproduction costs = Net income
$2,640,000 - $982,520 - $2,000 - $6,000 = $1,649,480
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-60
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
113. Given the Cool Pools Company data, what is net income using variable costing?
A. $1,649,4
80
B. $1,648,6
00
C. $1,627,1
50
D. $1,709,4
80
E. $1,708,6
00
Sales = $60(44,000) = $2,640,000
Variable overhead production costs per unit = $315,000/45,000 units = $7 per unit
COGS = DM + DL + VOH
[($11.25 + $3.20 + $7.00) × 44,000 units] = $943,800
Other variable cost (non-production) = $2,000
Total 'xed costs = $39,600 + $6,000 = $45,600
Sales - Variable COGS - Fixed costs = Net income
$2,640,000 - $943,800 - $2,000 - $45,600 = $1,648,600
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-61
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
114. Brush Industries reports the following information for May:
Sales $900,00
0
Fixed cost of goods sold 100,000
Variable cost of goods sold 250,000
Fixed selling and administrative
costs 100,000
Variable selling and administrative
costs 125,000
Calculate the gross margin for May under absorption costing?
A. $650,00
0
B. $325,00
0
C. $525,00
0
D. $550,00
0
Sales $900,000 - Cost of goods sold $350,000 = Gross margin $550,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-62
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
115. Reliance Corporation sold 4,000 units of its product at a price of $15 per unit. Total
variable cost per unit is $8.50, consisting of $7.75 in variable production cost
and.75 in variable selling and administrative cost. Compute contribution margin for
the company.
A. $26,00
0
B. $34,00
0
C. $60,00
0
D. $31,00
0
E. $36,90
0
$15.00 - $8.50 = $6.50 × 4,000 units = $26,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
116. Quaker Corporation sold 6,600 units of its product at a price of $42.40 per unit.
Total variable cost per unit is $19.25, consisting of $10.15 in variable production
cost and $9.10 in variable selling and administrative cost. Compute contribution
margin for the company.
A. $279,84
0
B. $119,13
0
C. $66,99
0
D. $152,79
0
E. $60,06
0
$42.40 - $19.25 = $23.15 × 6,600 units = $152,790
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
19-63
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
117. Geneva Co. reports the following information for July:
Sales $750,000
Variable costs 225,000
Fixed costs 100,000
Calculate the contribution margin for July.
A. $525,00
0
B. $425,00
0
C. $650,00
0
D. $750,00
0
Sales $750,000 - VC $225,000 = $525,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-64
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
118. Alexis Co. reported the following information for May:
Part
A
Units sold 5,000 unit
s
Selling price per unit $800
Variable manufacturing cost per
unit 520
Sales commission per unit - Part
A80
What is the manufacturing margin for Part A?
A. $1,000,0
00
B. $1,400,0
00
C. $3,600,0
00
D. $2,600,0
00
Sales (5,000 units × $800/unit) $4,000,0
00
Variable costs:
Variable manufacturing costs
(5,000 × $520/unit)
2,600,0
00
Manufacturing margin $1,400,0
00
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Manufacturing Margin
19-65
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
119. Alexis Co. reported the following information for May:
Part
A
Units sold 5,000 unit
s
Selling price per unit $800
Variable manufacturing cost per
unit 520
Sales commission per unit - Part
A80
What is the contribution margin for Part A?
A. $1,000,0
00
B. $1,400,0
00
C. $3,600,0
00
D. $2,600,000
Sales (5,000 units × $800/unit) $4,000,000
Variable costs:
Variable manufacturing costs (5,000 ×
$520/unit) 2,600,000
Manufacturing margin $1,400,00
0
Variable selling expenses (5,000 units x $80
per unit)
400,00
0
Contribution margin $1,000,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-66
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
120. Swisher, Incorporated reports the following annual cost data for its single product:
Normal production level 30,000 units
Direct materials $6.40 per unit
Direct labor $3.93 per unit
Variable overhead $5.80 per unit
Fixed overhead $150,000 in total
This product is normally sold for $48 per unit. If Swisher increases its production
to 50,000 units, while sales remain at the current 30,000 unit level, by how much
would the company's income increase or decrease under absorption costing?
A. $60,000
decrease.
B. $90,000
decrease.
C. There is no change in
income.
D. $90,000
increase.
E. $60,000
increase.
$150,000/30,000 units = $5 FOH per unit at 30,000 unit level
$150,000/50,000 units = $3 FOH per unit at 50,000 unit level
$5 - 3 = $2 less FOH cost in each unit sold
$2 × 30,000 = $60,000 increase
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-C1 Describe how absorption costing can result in overproduction.
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Production levels
19-67
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
121. Swisher, Incorporated reports the following annual cost data for its single product:
Normal production level 30,000 units
Direct materials $6.40 per unit
Direct labor $3.93 per unit
Variable overhead $5.80 per unit
Fixed overhead $150,000 in total
This product is normally sold for $48 per unit. If Swisher increases its production
to 50,000 units, while sales remain at the current 30,000 unit level, by how much
would the company's income increase or decrease under variable costing?
A. $60,000
decrease.
B. $90,000
decrease.
C. There is no change in gross
margin.
D. $90,000
increase.
E. $60,000
increase.
There would be no change because 'xed costs are expensed in the period in which
they are incurred, regardless of the number of units sold.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-68
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
122. Swola Company reports the following annual cost data for its single product.
Normal production level 75,000 units
Direct materials $1.25 per unit
Direct labor $2.50 per unit
Variable overhead $3.75 per unit
Fixed overhead $300,000 in total
This product is normally sold for $25 per unit. If Swola increases its production to
200,000 units, while sales remain at the current 75,000 unit level, by how much
would the company's gross margin increase or decrease under absorption costing?
A. $187,500
increase.
B. $112,500
increase.
C. There will be no change in gross
margin.
D. $112,500
decrease.
E. $187,500
decrease.
$300,000/75,000 units = $4 FOH per unit at 75,000 unit level
$300,000/200,000 units = $1.50 FOH per unit at 200,000 unit level
$4 - 1.50 = $2.50 less FOH cost in each unit sold
$2.50 × 75,000 = $187,500 gross margin increase
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-69
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
123. Swola Company reports the following annual cost data for its single product.
Normal production level 75,000 units
Direct materials $1.25 per unit
Direct labor $2.50 per unit
Variable overhead $3.75 per unit
Fixed overhead $300,000 in total
This product is normally sold for $25 per unit. If Swola increases its production to
200,000 units, while sales remain at the current 75,000 unit level, by how much
would the company's income increase or decrease under variable costing?
A. $187,500
increase.
B. $112,500
increase.
C. There will be no change in gross
income.
D. $112,500
decrease.
E. $187,500
decrease.
There would be no change because 'xed costs are expensed in the period in which
they are incurred, regardless of the number of units sold.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-70
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Red and White Company reported the following monthly data:
Units produced 2,000 units
Sales price $25 per unit
Direct materials $1 per unit
Direct labor $2 per unit
Variable overhead $3 per unit
Fixed overhead $8,000 in total
124. What is the Red and White's contribution margin for this month if 980 units were
sold?
A. $38,00
0
B. $18,62
0
C. $24,50
0
D. $50,00
0
E. $21,56
0
($25 - $1 - $2 - $3) = $19 × 980 units = $18,620
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-71
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
125. What is Red and White's net income under absorption costing if 980 units are sold
and operating expenses are $12,000?
A. $(1,38
0)
B. $(2,00
0)
C. $2,70
0
D. $6,62
0
E. $10,62
0
CM = ($25 - $1 - $2 - $3) = $19 × 980 units = $18,620
NI = $18,620 - (980 units)($8,000/2000 units) FC - $12,000 = $2,700
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Absorption Costing
126. What is Red and White's net income under variable costing if 980 units are sold
and operating expenses are $12,000?
A. $(1,38
0)
B. $(2,00
0)
C. $2,70
0
D. $6,62
0
E. $10,62
0
CM = ($25 - $1 - $2 - $3) = $19 × 980 units = $18,620
NI = $18,620 - $8,000 FC - $12,000 = $(1,380)
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
19-72
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Topic: Variable Costing
127. Decko Industries reported the following monthly data:
Units produced 52,000 units
Sales price $33 per unit
Direct materials $1.50 per unit
Direct labor $2.50 per unit
Variable overhead $3.50 per unit
Fixed overhead $234,000 in total
What is the company's contribution margin for this month if 50,000 units were
sold?
A. $1,326,0
00
B. $1,716,0
00
C. $1,275,0
00
D. $1,650,0
00
E. $1,450,0
00
($33 - $1.50 - $2.50 - $3.50) = $25.50 × 50,000 units = $1,275,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-73
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
128. Tim's Tools, a manufacturer of cordless drills, began operations this year. During
this year, the company produced 20,000 units and sold 18,000 units. At year-end
the company reported the following income statement using absorption costing:
Sales (18,000 × $30) $540,000
Cost of goods sold (18,000 × $14) 252,000
Gross margin $288,000
Selling and administrative expenses 90,000
Net income $198,000
Production costs per unit total $14, which consists of $12.90 in variable
production costs and $1.10 in 'xed production costs (based on the 20,000 units
produced). 60% of total selling and administrative expenses are variable. Compute
net income under variable costing.
A. $307,80
0
B. $198,00
0
C. $195,80
0
D. $288,00
0
E. $220,00
0
$198,000 - (2,000 units × FOH $1.10) = $195,800
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-74
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
129. Fields Cutlery, a manufacturer of gourmet knife sets, produced 20,000 sets and
sold 23,000 units during the current year. Beginning inventory under absorption
costing consisted of 3,000 units valued at $66,000 (Direct materials $12 per unit;
Direct labor, $3 per unit; Variable Overhead, $2 per unit, and Fixed overhead, $5
per unit.) All manufacturing costs have remained constant over the 2-year period.
At year-end the company reported the following income statement using
absorption costing:
Sales (23,000 × $45) $1,035,000
Cost of goods sold (23,000 × $22) 506,,000
Gross margin $529,000
Selling and administrative expenses 115,000000
Net income $414,000
60% of total selling and administrative expenses are variable. Compute net
income under variable costing.
A. $414,00
0
B. $399,00
0
C. $529,00
0
D. $429,00
0
E. $644,00
0
$414,000 + (3,000 units × FOH $5) = $429,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-75
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
130. Wind Fall, a manufacturer of leaf blowers, began operations this year. During this
year, the company produced 10,000 leaf blowers and sold 8,500. At year-end the
company reported the following income statement using absorption costing:
Sales (8,500 × $45) $382,50
0
Cost of goods sold (8,500 × $20) 170,000
Gross margin $212,50
0
Selling and administrative
expenses 60,000
Net income $152,50
0
Production costs per leaf blower total $20, which consists of $16 in variable
production costs and $4 in 'xed production costs (based on the 10,000 units
produced). Fifteen percent of total selling and administrative expenses are
variable. Compute net income under variable costing.
A. $146,50
0
B. $158,50
0
C. $237,50
0
D. $206,50
0
E. $246,50
0
$152,500 - ($4 × 1,500 units) = $146,500
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-76
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
131. Aces, Inc., a manufacturer of tennis rackets, began operations this year. The
company produced 6,000 rackets and sold 4,900. At year-end, the company
reported the following income statement using absorption costing.
Sales (4,900 × $90) $441,00
0
Cost of goods sold (4,900 × $38) 186,200
Gross margin $254,80
0
Selling and administrative
expenses 75,000
Net Income $179,80
0
Production costs per tennis racket total $38, which consists of $25 in variable
production costs and $13 in 'xed production costs (based on the 6,000 units
produced). Ten percent of total selling and administrative expenses are variable.
Compute net income under variable costing.
A. $194,10
0
B. $165,50
0
C. $311,00
0
D. $240,50
0
E. $233,00
0
$179,800 - ($13 × 1,100 units) = $165,500
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-77
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
132. Jeter Corporation had net income of $212,000 based on variable costing.
Beginning and ending inventories were 6,000 units and 10,000 units, respectively.
Assume the 'xed overhead per unit was $4 for both the beginning and ending
inventory. What is net income under absorption costing?
A. $252,00
0
B. $228,00
0
C. $244,00
0
D. $276,00
0
E. $212,00
0
$212,000 + (10,000 units × $4) - (6,000 × $4) = $228,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
133. Kluber, Inc. had net income of $900,000 based on variable costing. Beginning and
ending inventories were 55,000 units and 52,000 units, respectively. Assume the
'xed overhead per unit was $1.25 for both the beginning and ending inventory.
What is net income under absorption costing?
A. $833,12
5
B. $903,75
0
C. $966,87
5
D. $896,25
0
E. $900,00
0
$900,000 + (52,000 units × $1.25) - (55,000 × $1.25) = $896,250
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
19-78
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
134. Pact Company had net income of $972,000 based on variable costing. Beginning
and ending inventories were 7,800 units and 5,200 units, respectively. Assume the
'xed overhead per unit was $3.61 for both the beginning and ending inventory.
What is net income under absorption costing?
A. $962,61
4
B. $1,018,9
23
C. $925,07
7
D. $969,40
0
E. $981,37
9
$972,000 + (5,200 units × $3.61) - (7,800 × $3.61) = $962,614
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-79
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
135. Front Company had net income of $72,500 based on variable costing. Beginning
and ending inventories were 800 units and 1,200 units, respectively. Assume the
'xed overhead per unit was $7.90 for both the beginning and ending inventory.
What is net income under absorption costing?
A. $69,34
0
B. $75,66
0
C. $88,30
0
D. $56,70
0
E. $72,90
0
$72,500 + (1,200 units × $7.90) - (800 × $7.90) = $75,660
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Accessibility: Keyboard Navigation
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-80
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
136. Given the following data, calculate product cost per unit under variable costing.
Direct labor $8 per unit
Direct materials $3 per unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $30,000
Total fixed overhead $85,000
Expected units to be produced 50,000 units
A. $7 per
unit
B. $13.30 per
unit
C. $11.00 per
unit
D. $11.60 per
unit
E. $16.50 per
unit
$8 DL + $3 DM + ($30,000/50,000 units) VOH = $11.60
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-81
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
137. Given the following data, calculate product cost per unit under absorption costing.
Direct labor $7 per unit
Direct materials $1 per unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $20,000
Total fixed overhead $90,000
Expected units to be produced 40,000 units
A. $8 per
unit
B. $8.50 per
unit
C. $10.25 per
unit
D. $10.75 per
unit
E. $12 per
unit
$7 DL + $1 DM + ($20,000/40,000 units) VOH + ($90,000/40,000 units) = $10.75
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-82
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
138. Given the following data, calculate the total product cost per unit under variable
costing.
Direct labor $3.50 per
unit
Direct materials $1.25 per
unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $41,400
Total fixed overhead $150,000
Expected units to be produced 18,000 units
A. $4.75 per
unit
B. $7.05 per
unit
C. $15.38 per
unit
D. $13.08 per
unit
E. $16 per
unit
$3.50 DL + $1.25 DM + ($41,400/18,000 units) VOH = $7.05
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-83
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
139. Given the following data, calculate the total product cost per unit under absorption
costing.
Direct labor $3.50 per
unit
Direct materials $1.25 per
unit
Overhead
Total variable overhead $41,400
Total fixed overhead $150,000
Expected units to be produced 18,000 units
A. $4.75 per
unit
B. $7.05 per
unit
C. $13.08 per
unit
D. $15.38 per
unit
E. $16 per
unit
$3.50 DL + $1.25 DM + ($41,400/18,000 units) VOH + ($150,000/18,000 units)
FOH = $15.38
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
Matching Questions
19-84
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
140. Match the following
1. Direct labor, direct materials, and
manufacturing overhead. Gross margin 7
2. Costs that are expensed in the
period they are incurred.
Operating
capacity 4
3. Sales less variable expenses.
Manufacturing
margin
1
0
4. Maximum number of units that
can be produced in the period.
Absorption
costing 8
5. A costing method that includes
only variable manufacturing costs. Period costs 2
6. An income statement format that
focuses on cost behavior.
Contribution
margin 3
7. Sales less cost of goods sold. Variable costing 5
8. A costing method that includes all
manufacturing costs. Product costs 1
9. Contribution margin divided by
sales.
Contribution
format 6
10. Sales less variable production
costs.
Contribution
margin ratio 9
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
Topic: Manufacturing Margin
Topic: Product Costs
Topic: Variable Costing
Essay Questions
19-85
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
141. Identify the treatment of each of the following costs under variable costing and
absorption costing:
Variable Costing Absorption Costing
Product
Cost
Period
Cost
Product
Cost
Period
Cost
1. Direct materials
2. Direct labor
3. Variable manufacturing
overhead
4. Fixed manufacturing
overhead
5. Variable selling
6. Fixed selling
7. Variable administrative
8. Fixed administrative
Variable Costing Absorption Costing
Product
Cost
Period
Cost
Product
Cost
Period
Cost
1. Direct materials X X
2. Direct labor X X
3. Variable manufacturing
overhead X X
4. Fixed manufacturing
overhead X X
5. Variable selling X X
6. Fixed selling X X
7. Variable administrative X X
8. Fixed administrative X X
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
Topic: Variable Costing
19-86
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
142. What costs are treated as product costs under the absorption costing method?
Under absorption costing, direct labor, direct materials, and all manufacturing
overhead costs, both 'xed and variable, are treated as product costs.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
143. What costs are treated as product costs under the variable costing method?
Under variable costing, direct labor, direct materials, and variable manufacturing
overhead costs are treated as product costs. Fixed manufacturing overhead is
treated as a period cost.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
144. How can the use of absorption costing result in overproduction?
Absorption costing treats 'xed manufacturing overhead as a product cost. As a
'xed cost, the amount per unit goes down as the total number of units produced is
increased. If these excess units produced are not sold, the 'xed overhead cost
allocated to the units is not currently expensed. This reduction in cost per unit will
decrease cost of goods sold and increase net income. Therefore, companies must
guard against increasing production merely for the sake of increasing the current
period net income.
AACSB: Communication
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-C1 Describe how absorption costing can result in overproduction.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-87
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
145. When excess capacity exists, what is the minimum special order price a manager
should accept to increase net income?
With excess capacity, increases in production level would increase variable
production costs, but not 'xed costs. Therefore, managers should accept special
orders provided the special order price exceeds total variable cost.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
146. What are the benefit of using variable costing when striving to control costs? Are
these benefit available under absorption costing?
Under absorption costing, both variable production costs and 'xed production
costs are combined. This makes it diTcult to evaluate the eHectiveness of cost
controls by diHerent levels of managers. Variable costing separates the variable
costs from the 'xed costs and, therefore, makes it easier to identify and assign
control over costs.
AACSB: Communication
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Comparing Variable Costing and Absorption Costing
147. What is the formula to compute manufacturing margin?
Manufacturing margin equals sales minus variable manufacturing costs.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Manufacturing Margin
19-88
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
148. How does contribution margin diHer from gross margin?
Contribution margin equals sales less variable expenses. This is a subtotal used in
variable costing where costs are grouped according to cost behavior. Gross margin
equals sales less cost of goods sold. This is a subtotal used in absorption costing
where expenses are grouped according to function.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
149. How will net income under variable costing compare to net income under
absorption costing in the following three situations? Explain brieBy the cause of
any diHerences.
(a) Units produced equal units sold
(b) Units produced exceed units sold
(c) Units produced are less than units sold
(a) Income is identical under variable costing and absorption costing when the
units produced equal the units sold.
(b) When units produced exceed units sold, income under variable costing is less
than income under absorption costing. This is because some of 'xed overhead was
allocated to ending inventory under absorption costing, but all of fixed overhead
was expensed under variable costing.
(c) When units produced are less than units sold, income under variable costing is
greater than income under absorption costing. This is because absorption costing
is expensing some of a prior period's 'xed overhead in addition to the current
period's 'xed overhead, while variable costing is only expensing the current
period's 'xed overhead.
AACSB: Communication
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-89
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
150. What is a contribution margin report?
A contribution margin report presents cost data in a manner that emphasizes the
company's contribution margin and contribution margin ratio. The basic format is
to present sales less variable costs equaling contribution margin.
AACSB: Communication
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
151. What are the limitations of using variable costing?
Variable costing is not an acceptable basis for either external reporting or tax
reporting.
AACSB: Communication
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
152. What is the general procedure for converting variable costing net income to
absorption costing net income?
The general formula is variable costing net income plus 'xed production cost in
ending inventory less 'xed production cost in beginning inventory.
AACSB: Communication
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-90
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Short Answer Questions
153. A company is currently operating at 60% capacity producing 10,000 units. Cost
information relating to this current production is shown in the following table:
Per Unit
Sales price $21
Direct material $6
Direct labor $4.12
Variable overhead $2.23
Fixed overhead $0.80
The company has been approached by a customer with a request for a special
order for 5,000 units. What is the minimum per unit sales price that management
would accept for this order if the company wishes to increase current profit?
10,000/.6 - 10,000 = 6,666 unit remaining capacity
$6 + $4.12 + $2.23 = $12.35 incremental costs
Any sales price that exceeds the $12.35 incremental costs will increase current
pro'ts.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
19-91
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
154. A company is currently operating at 65% capacity producing 12,000 units. Cost
information relating to this current production is shown in the following table:
Per Unit
Sales price $6
Direct material $2.30
Direct labor $0.87
Variable overhead $0.91
Fixed overhead $0.70
The company has been approached by a customer with a request for a special
order for 2,000 units. What is the minimum per unit sales price that management
would accept for this order if the company wishes to increase current profit?
12,000/.65 - 12,000 = 6,461 unit remaining capacity
$2.30 + $0.87 + $0.91 = $4.08 incremental costs
Any sales price that exceeds the $4.08 incremental costs will increase current
pro'ts.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
19-92
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
155. A company is currently operating at 70% capacity producing 8,000 units. Cost
information relating to this current production is shown in the following table:
Per Unit
Sales price $15
Direct material $3.20
Direct labor $7.10
Variable overhead $0.05
Fixed overhead $0.60
The company has been approached by a customer with a request for a special
order for 1,500 units. The sales price per unit for this special order is $10. Should
the company accept the special order?
8,000/.7 - 8,000 = 3,428 unit remaining capacity
The company should not accept this special order. Incremental costs exceed
incremental income.
$3.20 + $7.10 + $0.05 = $10.35 incremental costs
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
156. Assume a company sells a given product for $33.28 per unit. How many units must
the company sell to break-even if variable selling costs are $1.40 per unit, variable
production costs are $23.56 per unit, and total fixed costs are $2,080,000?
$2,080,000/($33.28 - $1.40 - $23.56) = 250,000 units
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-93
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
157. Assume a company sells a given product for $95 per unit. Variable selling costs are
$24.25 per unit and variable production costs are $53.50 per unit. If the company
breaks even when selling 260,000 units, what are total 'xed costs?
$95 - $24.25 - $53.50 = $17.25 contribution margin per unit
$17.25 × 260,000 units = $4,485,000 total 'xed costs
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Variable Costing
158. Assume a company sells a given product for $18 per unit. Variable selling costs are
$0.70 per unit and variable production costs are $5.30 per unit. If the company
breaks even when selling 4,000,000 units, what are total 'xed costs?
$18 - $0.70 - $5.30 = $12 contribution margin per unit
$12 × 4,000,000 units = $48,000,000 total 'xed costs
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-94
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
159. Blackbird, Incorporated reports the following information regarding its production
cost:
Units produced 39,000 units
Direct labor $13 per unit
Direct materials $17 per unit
Variable overhead $7,800,000 in total
Fixed overhead $9,750,000 in total
a. Compute production cost per unit under variable costing.
b. Compute production cost per unit under absorption costing.
a. $13 DL + $17 DM + ($7,800,000/39,000) VOH = $230 per unit under variable
costing
b. $230 + ($9,750,000/39,000) FOH = $480 per unit under absorption costing
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
Topic: Variable Costing
160. Triton Industries reports the following information regarding its production cost:
Units produced 77,000 units
Direct labor $27 per unit
Direct materials $12 per unit
Variable overhead $2,541,000 in total
Fixed overhead $3,311,000 in total
a. Compute production cost per unit under variable costing.
b. Compute production cost per unit under absorption costing.
a. $27 DL + $12 DM + ($2,541,000/77,000) VOH = $72 per unit under variable
costing
b. $72 + ($3,311,000/77,000) FOH = $115 per unit under absorption costing
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
19-95
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Comparing Variable Costing and Absorption Costing
161. Home Base, Inc. reports the following production cost information:
Beginning inventory 10,000 units
Units produced 97,000 units
Units sold 92,000 units
Direct labor $17 per unit
Direct materials $34 per unit
Variable overhead $2,522,000 in total
Fixed overhead $1,940,000 in total
Operating costs $2,000,000 in total
Assume that productions costs have remained the same since the previous period
and all units are sold for $137.00 per unit.
a. Compute production cost per unit under variable costing.
b. Compute production cost per unit under absorption costing.
c. Determine net income using variable costing.
d. Determine net income using absorption costing.
a. $17 DL + $34 DM + ($2,522,000/97,000) VOH = $77 per unit under variable
costing
b. $77 + ($1,940,000/97,000) FOH = $97 per unit under absorption costing
c. NI = ($137 - $77)(92,000 units) - $1,940,000 - $2,000,000 = $1,580,000
d. NI = ($137 - $97)(92,000 units) - $2,000,000 = $1,680,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-96
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
162. Home Base, Inc. reports the following production cost information:
Units produced 97,000 units
Units sold 92,000 units
Direct labor $17 per unit
Direct materials $34 per unit
Variable overhead $2,522,000 in total
Fixed overhead $1,940,000 in total
a. Compute production cost per unit under variable costing.
b. Compute production cost per unit under absorption costing.
c. Determine the cost of ending inventory using variable costing.
d. Determine the cost of ending inventory using absorption costing.
a. $17 DL + $34 DM + ($2,522,000/97,000) VOH = $77 per unit under variable
costing
b. $77 + ($1,940,000/97,000) FOH = $97 per unit under absorption costing
c. (97,000 units - 92,000 units) × $77 per unit = $385,000 ending inventory under
variable costing
d. (97,000 units - 92,000 units) × $97 per unit = $485,000 ending inventory under
absorption costing
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-97
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
163. Lukin Corporation reports the following first year production cost information.
Units produced 62,000 units
Units sold 59,000 units
Direct labor $41 per unit
Direct materials $15 per unit
Variable overhead $9,300,000 in total
Fixed overhead $4,340,000 in total
a. Compute production cost per unit under variable costing.
b. Compute production cost per unit under absorption costing.
c. Determine the cost of ending inventory using variable costing.
d. Determine the cost of ending inventory using absorption costing.
a. $41 DL + $15 DM + ($9,300,000/62,000) VOH = $206 per unit under variable
costing
b. $206 + ($4,340,000/62,000) FOH = $276 per unit under absorption costing
c. (62,000 units - 59,000 units) × $206 per unit = $618,000 ending inventory
under variable costing
d. (62,000 units - 59,000 units) × $276 per unit = $828,000 ending inventory
under absorption costing
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-98
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
164. Lukin Corporation reports the following first year production cost information:
Units produced 62,000 units
Units sold 59,000 units
Sales price $350 per unit
Direct labor $41 per unit
Direct materials $15 per unit
Variable overhead $9,300,000 in total
Fixed overhead $4,340,000 in total
Operating expenses $1,000,000
a. Compute production cost per unit under variable costing.
b. Compute production cost per unit under absorption costing.
c. Determine the net income using variable costing.
d. Determine the net income using absorption costing.
a. $41 DL + $15 DM + ($9,300,000/62,000) VOH = $206 per unit under variable
costing
b. $206 + ($4,340,000/62,000) FOH = $276 per unit under absorption costing
c. NI = ($350 - $206)(59,000 units) - $4,340,000 - $1,000,000 = $3,156,000
d. NI = ($350 - $276)(59,000 units) - $1,000,000 = $3,366,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-99
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
165. Castaway Company reports the following first year production cost information:
Units produced 53,000 units
Units sold 51,000 units
Direct labor $8 per unit
Direct materials $4 per unit
Variable overhead $2,173,000 in total
Fixed overhead $3,339,000 in total
a. Compute production cost per unit under variable costing.
b. Compute production cost per unit under absorption costing.
c. Determine the cost of ending inventory using variable costing.
d. Determine the cost of ending inventory using absorption costing.
a. $8 DL + $4 DM + ($2,173,000/53,000) VOH = $53 per unit under variable
costing
b. $53 + ($3,339,000/53,000) FOH = $116 per unit under absorption costing
c. (53,000 units - 51,000 units) × $53 per unit = $106,000 ending inv. under
variable costing
d. (53,000 units - 51,000 units) × $116 per unit = $232,000 ending inv. under
absorption costing
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-100
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
166. Castaway Company reports the following first year production cost information:
Units produced 53,000 units
Units sold 51,000 units
Sales price $150 per unit
Direct labor $8 per unit
Direct materials $4 per unit
Variable overhead $2,173,000 in total
Fixed overhead $3,339,000 in total
Operating expenses $1,000,000 in total
a. Determine the net income using variable costing.
b. Determine the net income using absorption costing.
a. Product cost: $8 DL + $4 DM + ($2,173,000/53,000) VOH = $53 per unit under
variable costing
NI = ($150 - $53)(51,000 units) - $3,339,000 - $1,000,000 = $608,000
b. Product cost: $53 + ($3,339,000/53,000) FOH = $116 per unit under absorption
costing
NI = ($150 - $116)(51,000 units) - $1,000,000 = $734,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-101
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
167. A company reports the following information regarding its production cost:
Units produced 14,000 units
Direct labor $13 per unit
Direct materials $3 per unit
Variable overhead ? in total
Fixed overhead $56,000 in total
Required: Perform the following independent calculations.
a. Compute total variable overhead cost if the production cost per unit under
variable costing is $73.
b. Compute total variable overhead cost if the production cost per unit under
absorption costing is $73.
a. $13 DL + $3 DM + (VOH/14,000) = $73
VOH/14,000 = $57
Total VOH = ($57 × 14,000) = $798,000
b. $13 DL + $3 DM + (VOH/14,000) + ($56,000/14,000) FOH = $73
VOH/14,000 = $53
Total variable overhead = ($53 × 14,000) = $742,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-102
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
168. A company reports the following information regarding its production cost:
Units produced 22,000 units
Direct labor $31 per unit
Direct materials $27 per unit
Variable overhead ? in total
Fixed overhead $2,750,000 in total
Required: Perform the following independent calculations.
a. Compute total variable overhead cost if the production cost per unit under
variable costing is $240.
b. Compute total variable overhead cost if the production cost per unit under
absorption costing is $240.
a. $31 DL + $27 DM + (VOH/22,000) VOH = $240
VOH/22,000 = $182
Total variable overhead = ($182 × 22,000) = $4,004,000
b. $31 DL + $27 DM + (VOH/22,000) + ($2,750,000/22,000) FOH = $240
VOH/22,000 = $57
Total variable overhead = ($57 × 22,000) $1,254,000 total variable overhead
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-103
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
169. Digby Company manufactured and sold 37,000 units of its product at a price of
$93 per unit. Total variable cost per unit is $60, consisting of $58 in variable
production cost and $2 in variable selling and administrative cost. Fixed costs of
manufacturing are $350,000.
a. Compute the manufacturing margin for the company under variable costing.
b. Compute the contribution margin based on this data.
c. Compute the gross margin under absorption costing.
a. ($93 - $58) × 37,000 units = $1,295,000
b. ($93 - $60)(37,000 units) = $1,221,000
c. ($93 - $58)(37,000 units) - $350,000 = $945,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
170. Cavalier Corporation sold 26,000 units of its product at a price of $225 per unit.
Total variable cost per unit is $188, consisting of $103 in variable production cost
and $85 in variable selling and administrative cost. Compute the manufacturing
margin for the company under variable costing.
($225 - $103) × 26,000 units = $3,172,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Manufacturing Margin
19-104
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
19-105
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
171. Stonehenge Inc., a manufacturer of landscaping blocks, began operations on April
1 of the current year. During this time, the company produced 750,000 units and
sold 720,000 units at a sales price of $9 per unit. Cost information for this period is
shown in the following table:
Production costs
Direct materials $1.80 per unit
Direct labor $.30 per unit
Variable overhead $495,000 in total
Fixed overhead $450,000 in total
Non production costs
Variable selling and administrative $18,000 in total
Fixed selling and administrative $53,000 in total
a. Prepare Stonehenge's December 31st income statement for the current year
under absorption costing.
b. Prepare Stonehenge's December 31st income statement for the current year
under variable costing.
a.
STONEHENGE, INC.
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the nine months ended December 31, xx
Sales (720,000 × $9) $6,480,0
00
Cost of goods sold (720,000 × $3.36*) 2,419,2
00
Gross margin 4,060,80
0
Selling and administrative expenses ($18,000 +
$53,000)
71,00
0
Net income $3,989,8
00
*$1.80 + $.30 + ($495,000/750,000) + ($450,000/750,000)
= $3.36
b.
STONEHENGE, INC.
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the nine months ended December 31, xx
Sales (720,000 × $9) $6,480,00
19-106
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
0
Variable expenses
Variable production costs (720,000 ×
$2.76*)
1,987,2
00
Variable selling and administrative 18,000
Contribution margin 4,474,800
Fixed expenses
Fixed overhead 450,000
Fixed selling and administrative
expenses 53,000
Net income $3,971,80
0
*$1.80 + $.30 + ($495,000/750,000) = $2.76
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-107
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
19-108
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
172. Blatt Company, a manufacturer of slippers, began operations on June 1 of the
current year. During this time, the company produced 210,000 units and sold
185,000 units at a sales price of $40 per unit. Cost information for this period is
shown in the following table:
Production costs
Direct materials $5.00 per unit
Direct labor $4.75 per unit
Variable overhead $302,000 in total
Fixed overhead $405,000 in total
Non-production costs
Variable selling and administrative $9,000 in total
Fixed selling and administrative $25,000 in total
a. Prepare Blatt's December 31st income statement for the current year under
absorption costing.
b. Prepare Blatt's December 31st income statement for the current year under
variable costing.
a.
Blatt COMPANY
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the seven months ended December 31, xx
Sales (185,000 × $40) $7,400,0
00
Cost of goods sold (185,000 × $13.12*) 2,427,2
00
Gross margin 4,972,8
00
Selling and administrative expenses ($9,000 +
$25,000)
34,00
0
Net income $4,938,8
00
*$5 + $4.75 + ($302,000/210,000) + ($405,000/210,000)
= $13.12
b.
Blatt COMPANY
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the seven months ended December 31, xx
Sales (185,000 × $40) $7,400,0
19-109
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
00
Variable expenses
Variable production costs (185,000 ×
$11.19*)
2,070,15
0
Variable selling and administrative 9,00
0
Contribution margin 5,320,85
0
Fixed expenses
Fixed overhead 405,000
Fixed selling and administrative
expenses
25,00
0
Net income $4,890,8
50
*$5 + $4.75 + ($302,000/210,000) = $11.19
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-110
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
19-111
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
173. Wrap-It Company, a manufacturer of wrapping paper, began operations on June 1
of the current year. During this time, the company produced 370,000 units and
sold 310,000 units at a sales price of $50 per unit. Cost information for this period
is shown in the following table:
Production costs
Direct materials $2.00 per unit
Direct labor $.80 per unit
Variable overhead $814,000 in total
Fixed overhead $481,000 in total
Non production costs
Variable selling and administrative $78,000 in total
Fixed selling and administrative $210,000 in total
a. Prepare Wrap-It's December 31st income statement for the current year under
absorption costing.
b. Prepare Wrap-It's December 31st income statement for the current year under
variable costing.
a.
WRAP-IT COMPANY
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the seven months ended December 31, xx
Sales (310,000 × $50) $15,500,0
00
Cost of goods sold (310,000 × $6.30*) 1,953,00
0
Gross margin 13,547,00
0
Selling and administrative expenses ($78,000 +
$210,000)
288,00
0
Net income $13,259,0
00
*$2 + $.80 + ($814,000/370,000) + ($481,000/370,000) =
$6.30
b.
WRAP-IT COMPANY
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the seven months ended December 31, xx
Sales (310,000 × $50) $15,500,0
19-112
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
00
Variable expenses
Variable production costs (310,000 ×
$5.00*)
1,550,00
0
Variable selling and administrative 78,00
0
Contribution margin 13,872,00
0
Fixed expenses
Fixed overhead 481,000
Fixed selling and administrative
expenses
210,00
0
Net income $13,181,0
00
*$2 + $.80 + ($814,000/370,000) = $5.00
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-113
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
19-114
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
174. 32 Degrees, Inc., a manufacturer of frozen food, began operations on July 1 of the
current year. During this time, the company produced 140,000 units and sold
140,000 units at a sales price of $125 per unit. Cost information for this period is
shown in the following table:
Production costs
Direct materials $13.00 per unit
Direct labor $6.00 per unit
Variable overhead $2,100,000 in total
Fixed overhead $3,220,000 in total
Non production costs
Variable selling and administrative $91,000 in total
Fixed selling and administrative $458,000 in total
a. Prepare 32 Degree's December 31st income statement for the current year
under absorption costing.
b. Prepare 32 Degree's December 31st income statement for the current year
under variable costing.
a.
32 DEGREES, INC
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the six months ended December 31, xx
Sales (140,000 × $125) $17,500,0
00
Cost of goods sold (140,000 × $57*) 7,980,00
0
Gross margin 9,520,000
Selling and administrative expenses ($91,000 +
$458,000)
549,00
0
Net income $8,971,0
00
*$13 + $6 + ($2,100,000/140,000) + ($3,220,000/140,000) =
$57
b.
32 DEGREES, INC
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the six months ended December 31, xx
Sales (140,000 × $125) $17,500,0
00
19-115
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Variable expenses
Variable production costs (140,000 ×
$34*)
4,760,00
0
Variable selling and administrative 91,000
Contribution margin 12,649,00
0
Fixed expenses
Fixed overhead 3,220,000
Fixed selling and administrative
expenses
458,00
0
Net income $8,971,00
0
*$13 + $6 + ($2,100,000/140,000) = $34
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-116
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
175. State Industries has the following information for 2015:
Units produced and sold 3,000 units
Selling Price $260/unit
Direct materials $20/unit
Direct labor $40/unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead $120,000/yr
Fixed selling and administrative costs $160,000/yr
Variable manufacturing overhead $35/unit
Variable selling and administrative costs $25/unit
There are no beginning inventories. Prepare an income statement for the year
under absorption costing.
State Industries
Income Statement
Year Ended December 31, 2015
Sales (3,000 units × $260) $780,000
- Cost of Goods Sold 405,000
Gross Margin 375,000
- Selling and Administrative Costs 235,000
Operating Income 140,000
Feedback: Cost of goods sold = {Total variable manufacturing costs (x units sold)}
+ Fixed manufacturing overhead.
Cost of goods sold = [($20 + $40 + $35)(Total variable manufacturing costs) ×
3,000 units] + $120,000 (Fixed manufacturing overhead). Cost of goods sold =
$405,000.
Selling and administrative Costs = ($25 × 3,000 units) + $160,000 = $235,000.
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-117
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
176. Maloney Co. provided the following information for the year 2015:
Units produced and sold 4,400 units
Selling Price $400/unit
Direct materials $85/unit
Direct labor $55/unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead $130,000/yr
Fixed selling and administrative costs $165,000/yr
Variable manufacturing overhead $40/unit
There are no beginning inventories. Prepare an income statement using the
variable costing format.
Maloney Co.
Income Statement
Year Ended December
31, 2015
Sales 1,760,00
0
- Variable Costs 792,000
Contribution
Margin 968,000
- Fixed Costs 295,000
Operating Income 673,000
Feedback: Variable costs = 4,400 units × ($85 + $55 + $40) = $792,000
Fixed costs = $130,000 + $165,000 = $295,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Reporting
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-118
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
177. Materials Corporation sold 12,000 units of its product at a price of $67 per unit.
Total variable cost per unit is $54.94, consisting of $45.05 in variable production
cost and $9.89 in variable selling and administrative cost. Compute the
contribution margin for the company.
$67.00 - $54.94 = $12.06 × 12,000 units = $144,720
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
178. Countdown Inc. sold 17,000 units of its product at a price of $81 per unit. Total
variable cost per unit is $72.09, consisting of $69.05 in variable production cost
and $3.04 in variable selling and administrative cost. Compute the contribution
margin for the company.
$81.00 - $72.09 = $8.91 × 17,000 units = $151,470
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-119
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
179. Heather, Incorporated reports the following annual cost data for its single product:
Normal production and sales level 60,000 units
Direct materials $9.00 per unit
Direct labor $6.50 per unit
Variable overhead $11.00 per unit
Fixed overhead $720,000 in total
This product is normally sold for $56 per unit. If Heather increases its production
to 80,000 units while sales remain at the current 60,000 unit level, by how much
would the company's gross margin increase or decrease under absorption costing?
Assume the company has idle capacity to double current production.
$720,000/60,000 units = $12 FOH per unit at 60,000 unit level
$720,000/80,000 units = $9 FOH per unit at 80,000 unit level
$12 - 9 = $3 less FOH cost in each unit sold
$3 × 60,000 = $180,000 gross margin increase
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-120
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
180. Dataport Company reports the following annual cost data for its single product:
Normal production and sales level 89,000 units
Direct materials $14.00 per unit
Direct labor $21.00 per unit
Variable overhead $27.00 per unit
Fixed overhead $3,738,000 in total
This product is normally sold for $230 per unit. If Dataport increases its production
to 100,000 units, while sales remain at the current 89,000 unit level, by how much
would the company's gross margin increase or decrease under absorption costing?
Assume the company has idle capacity to double current production.
$3,738,000/89,000 units = $42 FOH per unit at 89,000 unit level
$3,738,000/100,000 units = $37.38 FOH per unit at 100,000 unit level
$42 - 37.38 = $4.62 less FOH cost in each unit sold
$4.62 × 89,000 = $411,180 gross margin increase
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-121
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
181. Chilly Chips, Inc., a producer of ice cream, began operations this year. During this
year, the company produced 160,000 cartons of ice cream and sold 145,000. At
year-end, the company reported the following income statement using absorption
costing:
Sales (145,000 × $6.50) $942,500
Cost of goods sold (145,000 × $3.50) 507,000
Gross margin $435,000
Selling and administrative expenses 252,000
Net income $183,000
Production costs per carton total $3.50, which consists of $2.30 in variable
production costs and $1.20 in 'xed production costs (based on the 16,000 units
produced). Sixty percent of total selling and administrative expenses are variable.
Compute net income under variable costing.
$183,000 - ($1.20 × 15,000 units) = $165,000
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-122
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
182. Anchovy, Inc., a producer of frozen pizzas, began operations this year. During this
year, the company produced 16,000 cases of pizza and sold 15,000. At year-end,
the company reported the following income statement using absorption costing:
Sales (15,000 × $48) $720,000
Cost of goods sold (15,000 × $19) 285,000
Gross margin $435,000
Selling and administrative expenses 79,000
Net income $356,000
Production costs per case total $19, which consists of $15.50 in variable
production costs and $3.50 in 'xed production costs (based on the 16,000 units
produced). Eight percent of total selling and administrative expenses are variable.
Compute net income under variable costing.
$356,000 - ($3.50 × 1,000 units) = $352,500
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
183. Toth, Inc. had net income of $950,000 based on variable costing. Beginning and
ending inventories were 60,000 units and 56,000 units, respectively. Assume the
'xed overhead cost per unit was $.85 for both the beginning and ending inventory.
What is net income under absorption costing?
$950,000 + (56,000 units × $.85) - (60,000 × $.85) = $946,600
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-123
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
184. Fanelli Company had net income of $678,000 based on variable costing. Beginning
and ending inventories were 5,000 units and 4,200 units, respectively. Assume the
'xed overhead cost per unit was $.50 for both the beginning and ending inventory.
What is net income under absorption costing?
$678,000 + (4,200 units × $.50) - (5,000 × $.50) = $677,600
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
Fill in the Blank Questions
185. Product costs consist of direct labor, direct materials, and _________________.
manufacturing overhead
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Product Costs
186. _______________ and _______________ are product costs that can be directly traced to
the product.
Direct labor; direct materials (either order)
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Product Costs
187. A traditional product costing approach is referred to as ______________.
absorption costing or full costing
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
19-124
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
188. Absorption costing is also called ________________________ costing.
full
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
189. ________________________ costing treats 'xed overhead as a period cost.
Variable
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
190. ________________________ is a costing method that includes all manufacturing costs
in unit product costs.
Absorption costing
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
191. A per unit cost that is constant at all production levels is a ________________________
cost per unit.
variable
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-C1 Describe how absorption costing can result in overproduction.
Topic: Variable Costing
19-125
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
192. When excess capacity exists, managers should accept a special order if the special
order price exceeds the ________________________.
total variable costs
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-A1 Use variable costing in pricing special orders.
Topic: Pricing Special Orders
193. ________________________ is equal to Sales minus Variable manufacturing costs.
Manufacturing margin
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Manufacturing Margin
194. Under variable costing, the product unit cost consists of
_______________________,direct materials, and variable overhead.
direct labor
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
195. Under absorption costing, the product unit cost consists of direct labor, direct
materials, variable overhead, and _______________________.
@xed overhead
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P1 Compute unit cost under both absorption and variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
19-126
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
196. On a contribution margin income statement, expenses are grouped according to
_______________.
cost behavior
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
197. _______________________ is the amount remaining from sales revenues after all
variable expenses have been deducted.
Contribution margin
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Variable Costing
198. ________________ is the amount remaining from sales revenues after cost of goods
sold has been deducted.
Gross margin
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Remember
difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
199. Reported income is identical under absorption costing and variable costing when
the units produced _______________ the units sold.
equal
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-127
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
200. _______________________ is the amount remaining from manufacturing margin after
all variable selling, general and administrative expenses have been deducted.
Contribution margin
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Manufacturing Margin
201. _______________________ costing is the only acceptable basis for both external
reporting and tax reporting.
Absorption
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Understand
difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 19-P2 Prepare and analyze an income statement using absorption costing and using
variable costing.
Topic: Absorption Costing
202. To convert variable costing net income to absorption costing net income,
____________________ the 'xed production cost in ending inventory and
_______________________ the 'xed production cost in beginning inventory.
add; subtract
AACSB: Analytical Thinking
AICPA: BB Industry
AICPA: FN Measurement
Blooms: Apply
difficulty: 3 Hard
Learning Objective: 19-P3 Convert income under variable costing to the absorption cost basis.
Topic: Converting Income under Variable Costing to Absorption Costing
19-128
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.