3
WOMEN, MURDER, AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
a wife killing her husband, or the killing by a ministerial to his superior. Women were very
seldom charged with pe)t treason for killing their husbands.
Women in London were o7en treated with way more leniency than men were. The
courts charged way less women with murder than men. While approximately forty women were
charged, over eight )mes the number of men were charged with serious crimes. Those women
who were charged for commi9ng murder were o7en in their early forty’s. Many women who
were in their twen)es when put on trial got o; on property crimes because of sympathy for the
principle of marital coercion. Due to the role of women in the household, those who commi5ed
murder were most likely found guilty of killing those individuals who they were around on a
daily basis. These individuals were the husbands, children, friends, neighbors, and co-workers of
these women. Not only were women rarely convicted of killing individuals whom they were
familiar with, but they were almost never convicted of stranger murder. However, those women
who were found guilty were many )mes found guilty of commi9ng murder publicly. Twenty–
4ve percent of women indicted were found to have committed murder in public loca)ons.
Hos)le rela)onships, drugs, alcohol, and mental illness were often factors found in these
instances where women were found guilty of murder.
When women were indicted for violent crimes such as murder, they were more o7en
found innocent than guilty. For instance in a consensus, juries acqui5ed 46 women, and only 29
women were found guilty. Of these 29 women, every last one of them were found guilty of
reduced charges. Courts realized that emotional responses by women under diAcult condition
could lead to violence. This is a reason for empathy towards women and gives the courts a