Limiting yourself to one career goal is best, if it is general. If you have a couple of
different jobs in mind, that is all right, too. However, your reasons for them should be
easily inferred or specifically stated. If you are truly unsure of what your goals are (and we
cannot talk you out of applying) always admit so honestly rather than make up something.
At the very least, though, give credible reasons for your indecision, and explain why you
believe that this school’s program will help you overcome your ambivalence.
Even if the question does not specifically ask for it, articulate why the particular program
makes sense for you given your unique professional and personal goals. To do this well,
you must spend the necessary time in introspection and also research the school. When you
understand the school’s program and positioning, use what you have uncovered only if you
can apply it to yourself. Do not write what you think they want to hear. Admissions
officers can spot this kind of insincerity from a mile away. They also seek a heterogeneous
mix of backgrounds and experiences. Therefore, trying to fashion yourself after your
conception of a typical applicant can hurt you even if you do it well. The truer you are to
your real motivations and desires, the better your essay will be.
SAMPLE ESSAY:
Discuss the factors that influenced your career decisions to date. Please describe your
professional goals for the future. How will the M.B.A. experience influence your ability to
achieve your goals? (Wharton)
“Stop foolin’ around, old boy. How would an M.B.A. help you? Better get on with your
career.” That’s what they say. Friends, colleagues, others.
I’ve heard it all before. “If I were you, I would not do it. Don’t waste your time, get ahead
with your studies as quickly as possible”, my professor for experimental physics told me.
That was back in ’88, and of course he was not talking about my M.B.A., but about my
intention to go to China: Take a special scholarship and go-for a year, to study Chinese,
and physics, in China. Get in line, professor. He was just one of many who did not approve
of my idea.
But for me, my plan clearly was: A chance, a challenge, and a choice. A chance to open my
intellectual door to the world Europeans consider the (psychologically) most distant one
from Western culture, and to broaden my view well beyond the usual. A challenge to learn
a language Westerners see as one of the most difficult in a compressed timeframe and to
adapt to a completely unfamiliar environment-while not letting this impact my overall
physics studies timeline. A choice to diverge from the mainstream path to exclusive
specialization in a single intellectual realm, not just on a spare time basis-but with serious