would most likely run away, or peck at the kid in an effort of self preservation, and the parent
would probably step in because chewing on a live chick is considered morally wrong. In a
similar way, if someone was to bring two items to a group of hungry people, one being
strawberries, and the other being a live piglet most people would clearly choose the fruit.
Ultimately, humans would choose to eat the apple or the strawberry instead of personally
slaughtering the chick or the pig. As stated by Tristram McPherson in his Journal of Moral
Philosophy, parents are feeding their children misconceptions that although they should love
some animals and they should eat another.
In the light of such misapprehension, traditions become molded into culture. We are the
only species on the planet to drink milk from another creature, and in general, drink it past
infancy. Although some people believe that they need the milk to grow tall and strong, there
remains to be no overarching benefit to drinking milk apart from your mothers. Why put a
product from a 2,000 pound animal into a human infant who is ten times smaller than the calf the
milk is meant for? In the first year of a calfs life they approximately gain four hundred pounds.
Tzachi Zamir, who hold a doctorate in philosophy, makes it clear that the milk people are
feeding to their loved ones essentially is a hormone and fat filled weight gainer meant for an
animal over ten times the size of a human. Unnatural practices such as these have become such a
social norm that children eat sugary cereal mixed with milk in the morning for breakfast, and
families serve a huge dead bird for their families every year on Thanksgiving. These practices
are not for the health benefits, they exist because the perceptions have transitioned from tradition
into culture.