Sulttan Aggad
BADM 332
08/30/17
Professor: Lisa
Q#1
In terms of consequences, one of the issues arises from question regarding the authenticity of
the document. Nothing is mentioned about us origins, dates or signature, if may, frequently
with illegally obtained documentation there are doubts about authenticity. In this case the
document may well be one which has been rejected. Amended ir altered substantially. It could
have been purely negative, perhaps prepared by management trainee. It could have been
prepared with guarantees, simply because the transaction’ ’never took place, and the giver of
information cannot be held responsible. If the use of the find is condoned, it impacts the
personal credibility of the manager for market intelligence. Who knows, she may have stolen
the document the next time the organization loses a documents she could become a likely
suspect. Condoning the use of the document sends subsequently this could lay the base for
claims and storytelling within the organization based on confidential non variable sources
rather than rigorous and reliable research.
One of the strongest arguments in favor of strictly ethical behavior is the conclusion that the
acceptance of unethical conduct at any level erodes the image and effectiveness of
management. Within the organization it erodes accountability than fortuitous circumstances or
illegal payments.
satisfaction level. Hence, it would improve the productively and performance of
employees.