choose which dream themes they had experienced frequently. The studies indicated
that 34 dream topics were reported by a large quantity of college students.
Hence, Griffith puted forward Typical Dreams Questionnaire (TDQ), which was
composed of 34 typical dreams. In the meanwhile, he found many culture differences.
Such as in American college students’ dream, fire appeared more frequently, while in
Japanese college students’ dream, nude appeared more frequently. Griffith considered
that the different culture background lead to the difference of typical dream.
These earlier studies provide the original evidence for the existence of typical
dream. But these studies can neither explain the type and frequency of the typical
dream nor explain the relationship between personality characteristics and socio-
cultural factors. What’s more it also can’t explain the significance of these typical
dreams to individual or society. Therefore, some new researches emerge just as the
times require. Psychologist Hall proposed a coding system for the contents of dream
in the 1950s, based on his dream theme analysis of university students. Then
psychologist Robert Van DE Castle perfected the system in the 1960s. Although the
system was able to provide an objective and effective method for the quantitative
research of dream, it can’t solve some questions such as the theme of the dream,
dimensions, or the characteristics of the typical dream. And other coding system is
very limited (Winget&Kramer.1979); it can only handle some dimensions of the
dream, which associated with the specific psychological theory. Home journals are a
very practical method in getting the typical dream, but when need a lot of subjects; it
is hard to work by using this way. It’s also very difficult to collect a lot of useful
information about the dream through laboratory. Zadra and Nielsen (1997, 1999)
revised and expanded the typical dream questionnaire on the basis of questionnaire of
Griffith R.M. (1958). They extend the number of typical dreams of the questionnaire
to 55. TDQ compared with these methods has more advantages in a wide range of
research topics of typical dream. Through the questionnaire for measuring you can
soon realize the most important theme of dream in a group of people.
At present, domestic research mainly focuses on the use of Hall /Van DE Castle
dream content encoding system, study of college students’ dream content
characteristics. They don’t have the investigation of the topic about dreams yet.
Therefore, this research adopts the revised questionnaire about typical dreams from
Zadra and Nielsen and measures college students all over China.
On the one hand, we want to collect the dream theme from the college students
in China, and do a comparison with foreign related research. Because Chinese and
western culture have very big difference, culture will react in the dream
unconsciously, Hoping that after comparing we can discover how cultural differences
reflect in the dreamer’s dream; On the other hand, we hope that through the study we
can find that the three most frequent dream theme of contemporary Chinese college
students, then we will use the psychological analysis method to analysis these three
typical dream based on Chinese culture. We try to find out the meaning hidden behind
these typical dreams, and further points out the profound significance for
contemporary college students and the contemporary Chinese society.