STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT
2
Standardized Assessment
Standardized assessment is much demonized in certain circles as an abhorrent type of
testing (Poulsen and Hewson, 2014). They highlight numerous challenges linked to the usage of
standardized assessments. Some criticize the procedure of the creation and administration of the
tests. At the same time, others disapprove of it because of it’s impact on learners. On the
contrary, specific individuals perceive standardized testing as a representation of real assessment.
These persons emphasize that this form of testing provides a platform for an unbiased
comparison of performance. The standardized assessment has acquired a central position in
American education (Poulsen and Hewson, 2014). Stakeholders in the field of education have
debated the value of this approach of assessment. Therefore, it is essential to create an
understanding of the procedure as well as analyze whether the method has accomplished its goal
in the education sector. This paper will explore the goals of a standardized approach and whether
the goals have been achieved or have failed. It will also uncover the advantages and
disadvantages, as well as analyze it through an ethical lens.
What is a Standardized Assessment?
Poulsen and Hewson (2014) define standardized assessment as a test in which all the
learners writing the examination tackle the same questions. It is designed to enhance fairness.
Students are expected to demonstrate the required information in a unified format, which are
commonly multiple choices. The setup of various choices is relatively easy to create, administer
as well as score. The experts argue that standardized assessment entails tests where instructions
are graded for all examinees (Poulsen and Hewson, 2014). It eliminates the aspect of some
students being at a disadvantage. According to the experts, each student is accorded a similar