The Impacts of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on Internal Controls 2
Abstract
On July 30, 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was regulated due to the many
accounting scandals that took place between the years of 2000 and 2002 by companies such as
Enron, WorldCom, and Global Crossing. The purpose of the Sarbanes-Oxley, specifically Section
404, was to require public companies to establish effective internal control in the hopes of
preventing material misstatements in their financial records. The purpose of this paper is to
outlines the positive and negative impacts that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 had on entities that
are required to comply with the new regulations. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was introduced
by Paul Sarbanes and Michael Oxley Sarbanes-Oxley and contains eleven titles, all with a
common goal of strengthening accountability of upper-level management as well as accounting
responsibilities. The Committee of Sponsoring Organization Internal control defines internal
control as “a process affected by an entity’s board of directors, management, and other personnel,
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives” (Dowling &
Jahmani, 2015, p. 129).
Requirements of Management
It has been proven that companies with weaknesses in internal controls are more likely to
increase the chances of having errors in their financial statements. Material misstatements in a
company’s financial statements are a major concern in the world of business. The main purpose of
an audit underlines both an internal and external auditors and management’s responsibility of
detecting and preventing fraud. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act brings to life to new methods of
accounting that managers of public companies are to use in order to prevent fraud from occurring.
Upper-level management must now authorize his or her company’s financial statements prior to
being submitted. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act now also requires management to report on any