Take-home Paper Assignment: Cherokee Removal

4 pages 1143 words
This is a preview content. A premier membership is required to view the full essay. View Full Essay
1
Darshilkumar Patel
HIST 1301
2 December 2017
Professor: Rodriguez
Take-home Paper Assignment: Cherokee Removal
The role of Cherokees in history was a continuous clash amongst shut personalities, and
territory holders. For A long time, the battle again land might have been those isolating
instruments flying amongst those new nationals of a new, free country and the tradition of the
Cherokees was being pushed back into the west. I think that there are three main reasons why
Cherokees should not have been removed from their home land due to following reasons; they
were civilized, removal treaty allowed them to remove was invalid, and it might have been
unethical to remove them.
All American tried to remove Cherokees from southern part of united states but they fight
against this removal and they failed. Finally, in 1838, they were removed from their land. In the
nineteenth century, rapidly-growing united states stretched into lower South, whites faced what
they viewed as an impediment. This region might have been home of the Cherokee, Creek,
Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole nations. These nations, in the perspective of people and large
portions different white Americans, were remaining in the way of progress. Andrew Jackson,
starting with Tennessee, might have been a Commanding proponent from claiming Cherokee
removal. Whites frequently argued that they ought to bring the Cherokees' land they didn't utilize
the territory in the way the whites did. They commonly roamed nomadically instead of settling
down to towns. Those territory might have been void for whites. This might have been not valid
for Cherokees. They required turn into civilized, owning lands and owing slaves. Therefore,
2
there might have been no handy justification to removing them. “The condition and destiny of
Indian tribes with in some states, have become interesting and important. It has long been the
policy of government to introduce among them the arts of civilization.”1
Secondly, the removal of the Cherokee was as far as anyone knows legitimate because
the Cherokee had marked a treaty allowing themselves to be moved. In any case, the legislature
did not make the arrangement with the fundamental Cherokee government. Rather, they made
the arrangement with a little gathering of Cherokee who claimed to represent to the country. This
treaty should not have been legitimate so the removal should not have been legal. Moreover,
government arrangement toward Cherokee was irresolute. Thomas Jefferson procured the
Louisiana Territory to some degree to discover a place for Cherokees who might not acclimatize