DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE
The
Sustainable
Mobility
Project
July 2002 Progress Report
Table of Contents
Introduction 4
A joint statement from the CoChairs on
behalf of the Sustainable Mobility Project
I. The Sustainable Mobility Project 5
Definition
Background
Objective & Scope
Members
Outreach
Three Phases
II. A World Wide Effort 8
A Global Network
Stakeholder Dialogues
Communications Outreach
III. A Snapshot of World Mobility 9
Mobility 2001
Background
Selected highlights
Personal mobility
Developing World
Intercity Travel
Freight mobility
Institutional capabilities
Scorecards for developed and developing countries
Final thoughts
IV. The Grand Challenges 15
Eight challenges that, being successfully
met, would go a very long way to assure
sustainable mobility
V. The Way In Which We
Move Ahead 16
A set of work streams
Assurance Process
The Final Deliverables
Launched in April 2000, the Sustainable Mobility Project has
already produced an insightful, arm’s-length analysis Mobility
2001, which describes clearly the challenges facing the world’s
current systems of transportation. The report is available at
the project’s website www.SustainableMobility.org
We have now launched the main phase of the project.
Representatives of twelve major global companies, members
of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development
(WBCSD), comprising the project’s core leadership, have
developed ten work streams, each of which is essential in
building an effective and meaningful response to the
challenges posed in Mobility 2001. An action team,
consisting of member companies but also including, for
several work streams, non-member organizations and
institutions, will manage each of the work streams. This
participation of external partners is essential to ensure the
quality of the project’s deliverables and a perspective
encompassing all major modes of transportation and all
regions of the world.
Indicators of sustainable mobility, selected by the project
after extensive consultations, will guide the action teams and
also be used to monitor team progress. Work streams will
address the supply and demand aspects of personal and
freight mobility, including infrastructure issues. They will
consider social, economic and political institutional capabilities,
which Mobility 2001 considers the “overarching” challenge
to achieving sustainable mobility. When these tasks are
accomplished, the project will focus on mobility in both its
urban and also its long-distance contexts, in developed and
developing countries.
Because one of the main purposes of the project is to develop
our visions of sustainable systems of mobility in 2030, we have
dedicated one work stream to this complex task. We will start
with a straw-man vision, but we fully expect it to change as
it is informed by the findings of the other work streams over
the next 18 months. Scenarios will be a feature of this work
stream, as will a series of mobility workshops involving a
range of partners and stakeholders from developing and
developed countries.
The integrity of the project and the quality of its work
product are the special focus of an Assurance Group, selected
by and reporting directly to the WBCSD. The men and
women of this group, representing different regions of
the world, are distinguished transportation and mobility
experts. The Assurance Group has already made several key
recommendations that the project has adopted.
The project hopes to create a platform for new and improved
cooperation among companies involved in mobility and to
outline plans for continued dialogue with stakeholder groups.
There is a growing understanding that business, governments
and NGOs need to join forces in creative ways if we are to
address effectively the challenges to mobility. We want to
encourage new partnerships, built on commitment to
common goals.
To be real advocates for sustainable mobility, our companies
must translate our words into actions. At this point in the
project, we do not yet know the full extent of what that may
require of us. However, as part of the project deliverables,
we intend to prescribe the steps required, over a realistic
timeframe, to achieve sustainable mobility.
The project will deliver, in December 2003, its visions of
sustainable mobility, looking forward to 2030, along with a
set of pathways for getting there. Although 2030 may seem
distant, in terms of transportation planning and execution,
28 years is a relatively short period of time. If we are to make
real progress by 2030, measures that will eventually produce
the necessary changes must be undertaken soon. We expect
this project to play a decisive role in moving our companies
forward and in helping to motivate other industries,
institutions and organizations to undertake similar efforts to
help define and achieve sustainable mobility.
4
Introduction
Thomas A. Gottschalk
Executive Vice President
General Motors Corporation
Dr Shoichiro Toyoda
Honorary Chairman
Toyota Motor Corporation
Philip Watts
Chairman of the Committee of Managing Directors
Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies
DEFINITION
Sustainable Mobility is the ability to
meet society’s need to move freely,
gain access, communicate, trade and
establish relationships without sacrificing
other essential human or ecological
values, today or in the future.
BACKGROUND
The Sustainable Mobility Project,
launched in April 2000, is motivated
by the dilemma facing future mobility:
on the one hand, mobility is essential
to modern civilization and human
needs; mobility systems are facilitators
of economic activities and human
relations. Mobility literally makes
modern economies possible. On the
other hand, there is a growing
understanding that the world’s
continuing and growing demand for
mobility cannot be met simply by
expanding today’s means of
transportation.
The project intends to point the way
to mobility systems which are more
efficient, more equitable, and less
environmentally and socially disruptive,
while preserving the benefits that
these mobility systems provide.
Improved mobility of persons and
goods has been a fundamental
precondition to the standard of living
now enjoyed by the vast majority of
individuals living in the developed
world. Improving mobility
opportunities is likewise a precondition
to enabling those living in the
developing world to attain a similar
standard of living.
Past improvement in mobility have
been purchased at a large cost to
society. Projections of the social and
environmental costs of achieving the
mobility opportunities sought by those
not now enjoying them indicate that
they will dwarf those incurred to date.
It is unlikey that present levels of
mobility in the developed world and
the desired levels sought by the
developing world are possible under a
“business as usual” mindset.
In short, the world’s present mobility
trajectory is unsustainable.
OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE
Under the auspices of the World
Business Council for Sustainable
Development (WBCSD) in Geneva, the
members of the Sustainable Mobility
Project have joined together to identify
how to address this dilemma. These
members are all companies whose
long-term survival depends on doing
so. However, they also realize that they
cannot make mobility sustainable by
themselves. The task requires more
talent and resources than any one of
them – or, indeed, the entire group –
can muster.
The objective of the project is to
establish a vision of sustainable
mobility in 2030 and various
pathways for getting there.
The project covers all aspects of
sustainability (social, environmental
and economic); all modes of mobility
(air, sea, and land transportation); and
all regions of the world, developing
and developed countries alike. It takes
a global perspective, because the
challenges are global, and solutions
will depend on cooperation among
governments, business, consumers
and other elements of civil society.
MEMBERS
The twelve core-group companies of
the project are: BP, DaimlerChrysler,
Ford, General Motors, Honda, Nissan,
Michelin, Norsk Hydro, Renault, Shell,
Toyota and Volkswagen.
The WBCSD Sustainable Mobility
Project is unique in a number of ways:
First, the project is unique in its
membership. Many of the toughest
issues facing the world in making
mobility sustainable require the actions
of multiple industries – as well as
actions by governments and the public.
The combination of motor vehicle
manufacturers, energy companies, and
materials and component suppliers
brings a unique breadth of experience
and range of capabilities to the search
for sustainable mobility.
Second, the project is unique in its
scope. It aims at nothing less than
producing a vision for achieving
5
www.SustainableMobility.org
I. The Sustainable Mobility Project –
its characteristics
“If we are to avoid a
continuing descent towards
unsustainable gridlock and
environmental degredation
then the way we move
ourselves about is going to
have to change. We believe
that our own commercial
future depends on our
ability to adapt and meet
these challenges”
Mr. Philip Watts,
Chairman of Shell’s Committee of
Managing Directors
sustainable mobility that would
incorporate all modes of transport, the
transport of goods as well as persons,
and transport in the developing as well
as in the developed world. Such a scope
is necessary if the range of issues
required to make mobility sustainable
are to be understood.
Third, the project is unique in its process.
It is making an extraordinary effort to
reach out to an extremely wide range of
stakeholders, both to assure that the
perspective of its sponsors is sufficiently
broad and to communicate its message.
OUTREACH
collaborative and creative interaction
within the international community,
sustainable mobility is likely to remain
out of reach.
T
THREE PHASES
The project has been organized into
three phases:
Phase 1: An analysis of current
patterns of mobility and their
sustainability. This phase
culminated in the Mobility 2001
report – a snapshot of world
mobility at the turn of the century,
The WBCSD Sustainable Mobility
Project is only about mid-way through
its scheduled lifetime. However, it
already has rung up a number of
important accomplishments:
First, it has assembled a group of firms
that, though competitors, must
cooperate in unique ways if mobility is
to become sustainable. It has helped
these competitors to move beyond
their parochial concerns and develop
a shared understanding of what
sustainable mobility means and what
it may require to achieve it.
Second, it has sponsored a report,
Mobility 2001, which is both
comprehensive and understandable to