Cyr 4
Results and Discussion:
Figure 1 above is an example of positive and negative results for presence of bacteria using 16S. The
fluoresced bands show DNA in the agarose gel. Below are the top four results 16S BLAST analysis of
JC362. As you can see the percent identity is 100% for both S. warneri and S. pasteuri.
Staphylococcus warneri strain DK131 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
439 439 100% 2e-119 100.00% MT642942.1
Staphylococcus pasteuri strain ML029 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
439 439 100% 2e-119 100.00% MT636753.1
Staphylococcus pasteuri strain BCVME2 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
439 439 100% 2e-119 100.00% MT598013.1
Staphylococcus warneri strain 513 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
439 439 100% 2e-119 100.00% MT573107.1
There could be presence of both species in the sample’s skin
cells, but we want a reliable confirmation if there is only one
species since they are commonly misidentified as each other.
The advantages of whole-cell PCR include: it is more cost-
efficient than DNA extraction from a kit, it is quick and dirty to
plate on the agar plates, and easily isolated when replated
again. Blaiotta et al. (2004) sought after species-specific PCR
while also confirming identification, but they used singleplex
PCR rather than multiplex PCR. S. epidermidis, S. capitis, and S.
caprae are also misidentified species of coagulase-negative
staphylococci. Ghebremedhin, Layer, Konig, & Konig establish
that the sodA gene found 94% similarity between S. capitis and
S. caprae (2008). Table 1 shows the data regarding the
identified species. The 16S rRNA PCR column shows which
bacterial identification sequenced with BLAST that 16S could
do. Species-specific PCR in the next column shows the
superiority it has over 16S for reliable identification. With the
use of the 172,173,174,175 multiplex primers, S. warneri was
identified in samples JC362, JC126, JC131, JC135, JC137, and
JC140, seen in Figure 2. In Figure 2, lane 1 is the positive control for S. pasteuri, lane 2 is the positive
control for S. warneri and the samples that fluoresced show the identification of S. warneri. Previously
identified S. epidermidis samples from 16S: JC361, JC367, JC373, JC374, JC376, JC377, JC401, JC404,
JC407, JC411, JC412, JC413, JC414, JC417, JC421, JC121, JC122, and JC124 were confirmed as S.
epidermidis with the use of the 166,167-multiplex primers in PCR, shown in Figure 3. The presence of
bands in Figure 3 confirm the bacterial identification as S. epidermidis. Sample JC110 was identified as S.
epidermidis with 164, 165, 166, and 167 multiplex primers. Samples JC111 and JC113 were identified as
S. capitis with 164, 165, 166, and 167 multiplex primers. These positive results can be seen in Figure 4.
Although there were no positive controls for S. capitis or S. caprae, the amplicon size was used for S.
capitis and there were no S. caprae samples that were present at 252 bp. Unconfirmed species using
species-specific PCR were not visually present on agarose gels but were tested twice. There could be a