Helen Rubio
Women, Food and Health
September 26, 2017
The context in which soul food was created is not romantic in the least. In fact, chitlins,
collard greens and other foods we’ve come to regard as staples of a soul food diet are actually
byproducts of slave trade in the Americas. As it was stated in Hurt’s work “slavery may have
been racially based, but it was an economic proposition, and it was not economic to put all those
people in a ship and have them die” (Hurt, 5:18). This economic incentive led many slave traders
to study the people they were transporting in order to provide basic necessities – amongst these
needs, was food. The food given to slaves by traders did not resembles today’s items in spice or
appearance, however. Food given to those on the ship were select items from their countries of
origin and were meant purely for sustenance. Burns even refers to these offerings as being “the
poorest quality foods” (Hurt, 5:10). Similarly, the rudimentary relationship between bread and
the people of Bosa was a very humble one; bread in this isolated town became a staple as a result
of the town’s largely subsistent wheat cultivating and animal herding economy (Counihan, 1999,
p. 26). Though the two cultures differed in the natural resources they used, they ultimately shared
the same end-goal: sustenance.
Furthermore, the true practice of preparing and cooking soul food did not begin till
slaves were put on communal plantations. The slaves’ relationship with the land was described in
documentary as follows: “Under some systems they [slaves] had provision grounds and in the
provision grounds they were expected to grow their food. Remember, slaves were responsible
not only for growing their food, but in many cases for growing the food for the entire plantation”
(Hurt, 7:27). Thus, slaves became a vital part of the developing food system. They took on the