1
INTRODUCTION
In this situation, the Wilfrid Glass Company, a Canadian-based glass producer with a prevailing
portion of the worldwide market, is hoping to enlist ahead of correspondence who will be
accountable for both interior and outer correspondence for the organization. There is a discussion
happening about the necessary up-and-comers’ reference checks, which prompts the
accompanying issue circumstance.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
The organization’s leaders and the Director of Human Resources are continually discussing
whether to lead a reference and individual verification. Assuming that they stand by excessively
lengthy orders, they risk losing the up-and-comer. Along these lines, in this situation, the head of
HR examines the circumstance and gives the accompanying systems and replies to the relevant
inquiries.
SOLUTIONS TO GIVEN QUESTIONS AND DOUBTS
ANSWER1:Checking references are commonly regarded as an unavoidable part of the hiring
process. Reference checks are intended to help you learn more about your candidate’s work
history, education, and characteristics. Conducting employment reference checks assists you in
determining which of your candidates is the best fit for your client’s communication director
position. Some of the arguments in favour of a reference check.
1. It offers one line of defence in the event of a negligent hiring claim.
2. It allows the Company’s executives to gain perspective on the applicant from other employers
who have worked with him or her in the past, as the position of communication director is a
high-level position. It’s simple; it has a lot of responsibilities to fulfil, and it’s all about the
company’s reputation.
3. This may provide additional information as to what was discovered during the interview
process.
Some of the factors that work against the reference check are as follows: