Running head: SHOULD THE UNITED STATES CONTINUE TO ACT AS A POLICEMAN
FOR OTHER COUNTRIES?
Should the United States Continue to Act as a Policeman for Other Countries?
The police are the internal regulation and control of a political unit, through managing
and exercising governmental powers with respect to safety, health, morals, comfort, and
prosperity. They are trained to prevent crime, law enforcement, and authorized to maintain peace
and safety to the community or country. So, imagine a country with no police, no one to protect
you, no laws or regulations? That would be crazy, the people are not going to feel protected nor
safe in their own countries and homes. There are several countries or section of countries where
the outlaws are dominated like North Korea, Somalia, the tribal area along the Afghan border in
Pakistan, Libya and Iraq. Also, Iran is one of the countries that threatens their neighbors with
violence (Reed, 2015). Now imagine the world with no police, no protection, no laws or
regulations? Do we really want to live in a world with no policeman?
The United States is one of the most powerful countries in the world. It is dominating in
the world’s economic and political systems. It has one of the largest and strongest militaries
which makes it capable of global power projection, along with that, it gives its huge influence
worldwide. Some say that the geographic location of the United States plays a big role for its
dominance over other countries. The strategic position of it gives it some geographical
advantages, for example: getting benefits from abundant national resources, strong industrial
base, high worker productivity, also laying their control in the Atlantic and Pacific (Marsh,
2015). With all that being said, the United States is more than capable in dominating in the world
over all other countries. But being capable of doing something, does not mean it is the right thing
to do.