Task 1: A persuasive comparison makes a comparison between two things in order to cause to
you take a certain perspective regarding the thing compared.
Task 2: I couldn’t wait to meet other spiritual seekers who were just as loving, kind, and cheerful
as the authors of the books and blogs I read. That didn’t happen. Instead, almost every “spiritual”
person I met was cruel, manipulative, toxic, and narcissistic.
Task 3: In this case the blogger compared their online and offline interaction with religious
leaders. They used positive words such as “loving” and “cheerful” to describe the online
experiences then used words such as “cruel” and “toxic” to describe words that were meant for
the in-person experiences. They put both experiences side by side and created a drastically
differing comparison that persuades the reader into believing in what the blogger described.
Task 1: We use innuendo whenever we communicate something not by saying it, but by
implying it.
Task 2: Finally, I lived with another “spiritual seeker” for eight months who was narcissistic,
manipulative, and toxic but who insisted on being my “spiritual guru” simply because she liked
crystals and astrology. She constantly pushed her beliefs on the rest of the house, would cry
when something didn’t go her way, neglected her cat to the point where he passed away, and
would constantly manipulate people to clean and do chores for her (she would literally have
random people come over to do her chores without tell the rest of the house, which obviously
freaked us out). She made our lives a living hell every day until she moved out
Task 3: The blogger is using innuendo in order to imply that the majority of the current religion
leader are not good people. They go into great detail of how this leader abused their power and