Iowa’s Convicted Felons and Recidivism Rates:
How can the State Address the Growing Issue?
Report Author: Thomas Fite
Assignment: Individual Project Step 5
Class: MSC 622-01
Instructor: Dr. Laird Burns
Date Submitted: 12/03/2020
College of Business ii
Executive Summary
I conducted this analysis to analyze trends and patterns in the criminal statistics and
recidivism rates in Iowa from 2010 to 2015. There are several goals for this project, which
include: identifying which demographics in the state commit the most criminal offenses by sub-
type, determine the average length of time it takes a convicted felon to return to prison, identify
which judicial district or judicial districts account for the highest number of offenders by
different demographics and finally, identify which judicial district or districts in Iowa have the
highest recidivism rates. The primary data set was published by the Iowa Department of
Corrections and retrieved from the Iowa Data Portal. Due to formatting issues, spelling mistakes,
and duplicate values (which initially led to problems when importing data into Tableau), I had to
clean the data in excel. I built a second data source to populate the longitude and latitude
coordinates for each of Iowa’s ninety-nine counties.
For my analysis method, I solely used Tableau to conduct descriptive, predictive, and
prescriptive analytics across several different factors allowing me to gain a more in-depth insight
into the problem at hand. I used descriptive analytics for most of my data to precisely pinpoint
the primary offending group by various demographics and judicial districts. Additionally, due to
the volume of data, I used averages to determine the number of days offenders stay out of prison.
I included several different trend lines and interactive maps highlighting the current trends for
my predictive and prescriptive analytics, allowing me to draw relevant conclusions on what
could happen in Iowa.
Several trends and patterns have emerged from the data set and which I explain in detail
in this report; the following is a snapshot of these trends and patterns. First, this report finds that
90% of all convicted felons in the state of Iowa are male. Next, the report found that one-third of
all convicted felons are between 25 and 34. Third, White Non-Hispanics account for two-thirds
of all offenders. Moreover, Black Non-Hispanics are disproportionally incarcerated based on
population size. The first pattern observed in my analysis is that several of the state’s
rehabilitation programs are actively reducing the average number of days it takes a felon to
return to prison due to a new criminal conviction or a violation of probation or parole. The
second pattern detected is that judicial district 5, the state’s capital region, accounts for the most
convicted felons, most of all criminal offenses committed from 2010 to 2015, and having the
highest recidivism rate. The recommendations discussed in this report include reviewing the
state’s current criminal justice policies, evaluating the state’s rehabilitation programs, and assess
and address the various factors, such as education, income level, and employment, across the
judicial districts that play a role in higher recidivism rates.
Upon completing my report and my analysis, I have found several limitations in the data
that may influence the outcome. These limitations include prior criminal history, employment
status, living condition, income level, educational attainment, and mental capacity. State officials
may need to conduct further analysis to see the effects of these additional metrics on Iowa’s
recidivism rates.
College of Business iii
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ii
Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1
Convicted Felons Across Iowa …………………………………………………………………………………… 2
Recidivism Rates …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3
Target Population by Offense Sub-Type (i.e. Participant in a Rehabilitation Program) ………… 3
Number of Convicted Felons Across Iowa by Original Offense Sub-Type ……………………………. 4
Recidivism by New Offense Sub-Type …………………………………………………………………………. 5
Averages Days Felons took to Return to Prison ……………………………………………………………. 5
Average Days Felons took to Return to Prison by Offense Sub-Type …………………………………. 6
Iowa Judicial Districts and Total Percentage of Felons …………………………………………………… 6
Change in Number of Felons Across the Districts ………………………………………………………….. 7
Change in Original Offense Sub-Type by Districts …………………………………………………………. 7
Change in Recidivism Rates by Districts …………………………..………………………………………….. 7
Conclusion and Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………….. 8
References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11
Appendix A …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. A-1
Criminal Statistics in Iowa: Evaluating Sex, Age, Race/Ethnicity and Recidivism Rates Across Iowa
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. A-1
Convicted Felons Across Iowa ……………………………………………………………………………………….. A-2
Recidivism Rates ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… A-2
Target Population by Offense Sub-Type (i.e. Participant in a Rehabilitation Program) ……………… A-3
Number of Convicted Felons Across Iowa by Original Offense Sub-Type ……………………………….. A-3
Recidivism by New Offense Sub-Type …………………………………………………………………………….. A-4
Averages Days Felons took to Return to Prison ………………………………………………………………… A-4
Average Days Felons took to Return to Prison by Offense Sub-Type …………………………………….. A-5
Iowa Judicial Districts and Total Percentage of Felons ……………………………………………………….. A-5
Change in Number of Felons Across the Districts ………………………………………………………………. A-6
Change in Original Offense Sub-Type by Districts ……………………………………………………………… A-6
Change in Recidivism Rates by Districts ………………………………………………………………………….. A-7
Wrap-Up and Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………………… A-7
College of Business 1
Introduction
Growing up in a small rural Iowa town, my parents taught me to obey the rules and
respect those who enforce them. And since our town was small, it was not uncommon to be on a
first-name basis with our local police or county sheriff. Because of these close relationships, I
developed a sense of passion and interest in all types of law enforcement activities. This passion
grew throughout my formative years when I was able to job shadow several different cops. My
brother has been in and out of the Iowa correctional system for the last 15 years due to parole or
probation violations. This experience has personally affected my parents more than me, who
consistently questioned their parenting abilities and where they went wrong in raising my
brother, especially given that I am the opposite of him. While I am at a point in my life where I
don’t believe he will change his ways, I have remained interested in understanding why he, along
with other felons, commit crimes and consistently return to prison.
The primary audience for this report is me. First, the analysis was completed as part of a
class project to demonstrate acquired skills throughout the semester. Second, by conducting this
analysis, I was able to gain a greater understanding of the tendencies of felons, the types of
offenses committed, which judicial districts have the higher preponderance of criminals, which
crimes have higher recidivism rates, and what steps the state is taking or should take to lower the
recidivism rates. Three other audiences may have an interest in these analytics. The first is my
parents, who, like me, want to understand why convicted felons act the way they do and why
certain crimes, such as my brothers, have a higher recidivism rate. Second, public officials with
the state of Iowa. Public officials may take this data and conduct additional analysis to
understand the prison system’s problems and implement policy reform or improve rehabilitation
programs. A final audience could be anyone who may have an interest in crime statistics or
recidivism rates. They should be able to take this data and the associated visualizations and draft
their conclusions, some of which may be different than what I have formed throughout this
report.
The data set used was published by the Iowa Department of Corrections and retrieved
from the Iowa Data Portal. The data set contained several different factors that included: Year of
Arrest, Year of Recidivism, Age at Release, Judicial District, Release Type, Race/Ethnicity, Sex,
Original Offense Classification, Return to Prison Status, New Offense Classification, and Target
Population. I manually cleaned the original data set through Excel due to formatting issues,
spelling mistakes, and duplicate values. Additionally, I manually created a second data set in
Excel with the following columns: Judicial District, City, Latitude, Longitude, County, and FIPS
[Federal Information Processing Standard, which uniquely identifies U.S. counties]. I created the
additional sheet to build a map in Tableau to establish the judicial districts in Iowa, giving a
more holistic view of the problem. Because I had two different datasheets, I had to join the two
in Tableau to make the data work for my project.
My sole analytics approach was Tableau because of the advanced visualizations it offers.
With Tableau, I can briefly provide several different viewpoints through unique visualizations to
tell the story. My project consists of twenty-five individual sheets, fifteen dashboards, and one
College of Business 2
comprehensive storyboard. Throughout my project, I have color-coded the data to ensure the
visualizations stand out from one another, included tooltips, highlight features, filtering options,
and advanced animations, to allow the individual to interact with the data and form relevant and
informed conclusions.
The rest of this report focuses on the analysis I conducted and the methods I used to draw
the conclusions I’ve made. Because my data set ranges from 2010 to 2015, I primarily used
descriptive analytics, explicitly analyzing the number of felons by age, sex, race/ethnicity,
offense type, average days return to prison and the change in percentage of offenders across the
districts using these same metrics. I used predictive and prescriptive analytics to draw additional
conclusions using different trend lines and interactive maps, highlighting what could happen in
Iowa if the trends continue and what should be done by the public officials to reverse the trends.
I will conclude this report by providing my recommendations, grounded in additional research,
to best tackle this problem and reduce Iowa’s growing recidivism rates.
Convicted Felons Across Iowa
This first visualization begins laying the groundwork for my entire project by
descriptively analyzing the total number of convicted felons across the state from 2010 to 2015.
Specifically, the charts break out individual demographics such as sex, age, and race/ethnicity.
By isolating specific demographics, I can precisely identify which groups are more likely to
commit felony related crimes, allowing me to begin to identify potential trends and apply the
results in follow-on visualizations and charts.
Because this visualization includes different demographics from across the state, I found
it essential to incorporate the 2010 U.S. Census results in this report. According to the 2010 U.S.
Census, Iowa had a total population of 3,046,355 million people, split equally between males and
females (CensusViewer, 2011-2012). My analysis results in the first chart [Top Left] indicating
that males account for 87.16% of the total prison population. The second chart, presented in this
visualization [Top Right], analyzes the differences in age groups at the time of release. From this
chart, we can see that felons aged 25-34 account for 9,554 out of 26,020 offenders, or 36.72% of
the population. The next closest age group is 35-44, who account for an additional 6,224, or
23.92% of the population. Because the U.S. Census uses more broad categories for age, it is not
easy to compare the census data results to this chart’s results. The final chart presented in this
visualization looks at the differences in Race/Ethnicity of convicted felons [Bottom]. According
to the 2010 Census, White Non-Hispanics accounted for 91.31% of the total population, with
Black Non-Hispanics accounting for the next highest at 2.93% (CensusViewer, 2011-2012). My
analysis shows that 67.61% of the prison population was White Non-Hispanic and Black Non-
Hispanics account for 23.52%. Based on the population data from the U.S. Census and these
results, it appears that Black Non-Hispanics are disproportionally represented in the criminal
statistics and have a higher frequency of arrests.
What is intuitive about this visualization is the highlighting and filtering of different
demographics to drill down into the data set, allowing the individual to gain clarity across
specific dimensions. Furthermore, I have added a tooltip to the visualization to associate a
College of Business 3
physical number to the percentage located in the box. Many of these same features have been
applied to successive dashboards to allow the individual to use specific constraints for detailed
results.
Recidivism Rates
Continuing my descriptive analytics, this visualization examines the total number of
felons returning to prison, or recidivism rate, by sex, age, and race/ethnicity. The Association of
State Correctional Administrators (ASCA) defines recidivism “as the tendency of a convicted
criminal to relapse, resulting in re-arrest, reconviction or return to prison with or without a new
sentence during a three-year period following the prisoner’s release (National Institute of Justice,
2020). According to a 2015 report from the U.S. Sentencing Commission, recidivism rates across
the nation have steadily declined since 2005, averaging 33.7% over the last ten years (Federal
Bureau of Prisons, 2016). Furthermore, while the national average for recidivism is on the
decline, Iowa’s rate has been steadily rising since a low in 2014, when recidivism rates were
29.8% (Iowa Department of Corrections, 2016). The results of this visualization will help me
form relevant conclusions on the recidivism rates for different demographics, which will
continue to allow me to identify trends and apply these results to other visualizations within the
project.
As previously mentioned, this visualization focuses on the recidivism rates of convicted
felons using different demographics. The individual articulating the chart can select either “no”
or “yes” on return to prison. By selecting “no,” the individual will receive detailed results of
felons who did not meet the recidivism threshold by sex, age, and race/ethnicity. By highlighting
“yes,” we see that males are eight times more likely to re-offend than females in the first chart.
Furthermore, we can use the drop-down filter for gender and form more relevant conclusions
about the population regarding age and race/ethnicity. This filtering indicates that White Non-
Hispanic males aged 25 to 34 have a recidivism rate of 69%. White Non-Hispanic females have
a higher recidivism rate of 75.03%. The next highest recidivism rate is Black Non-Hispanics.
Where male felons return to prison 24.17% of the time and females return to prison 18.42%.
These results are starkly different than what is being observed and reported at the national level.
In which, Black/African American males aged 35-39 were 86.9% more likely to re-offend,
followed by Hispanic males at 64.6% (Gramlich, 2020).
Target Population by Offense Sub-Type (i.e. Participant in a Rehabilitation Program)
Continuing to use descriptive analytics, this visualization identifies whether a felon was
part of the state’s target population. The term target population refers to rehabilitation programs
offered by the state to reduce the recidivism rate. Like other rehabilitation programs across the
U.S., Iowa’s programs include substance abuse counseling, specialized sessions for sexually
violent criminals, educational counseling and classes, life skills training, and learning new trades
to integrate back into society (Iowa Department of Corrections, 2016). The purpose of this
visualization allows me to form an educated opinion on what rehabilitation programs are
working and which ones are not as effective. Additionally, I can use the “not targeted”
population results to recommend whether a rehabilitation program needs additional resources or
complete reform.
The descriptive analytics in this visualization has three different filter options, age at
release, offense sub-type, and race/ethnicity, which allows me to form more appropriate
conclusions about the population. I choose the broader category of offense sub-type because it
gives more detailed results of a specific criminal offense. This will allow me to infer which
rehabilitation program an offender may have undergone before his/her release. It is essential to
highlight that Iowa does not require every felon to be a part of a rehabilitation program.
Criminals may voluntarily request assistance or can be mandated through sentencing (Iowa
Department of Corrections, 2016).
Focusing primarily on the targeted population, my first conclusion that I have arrived at
is for males aged 25-34. The results indicate that rehabilitation programs for males operating
under the influence (OWI), committing assault, vandalism, and murder/manslaughter related
offenses have the most impact. Whereas for females in the same age bracket, rehabilitation
programs for assault, theft, and drug-related (distribution) offenses have the most significant
impact. Conversely, the data suggests that rehabilitation programs for males committing
burglary, forgery/fraud, sex crimes, and trafficking are not working as intended. And for females,
rehabilitation programs for burglary, drug possession, trafficking, and vandalism are insufficient.
I made my conclusions based on a side by side comparison of the two bar charts and the two
measures’ variance. After running through the different filter options, it appears that