Sandefur 1
Emily Sandefur
Waltman
ENGL 2112
20 November 2013
Realism vs. Naturalism
Realism and Naturalism are the names of two comparable movements that spread at the
end of the nineteenth century. In literature, Realism and Naturalism are both defined as writing
theories that provide basic views of life. Along with their many similarities, though, are a few
key differences that help distinguish Realism from Naturalism.
Realism in literature tends to be the plain and straight-forward account of the subject
being written about. It calls for an accurate depiction of life as it really is. In the nineteenth
century, realistic writers did their best to observe life and present their observations through their
writings. A lot of them focused on the harsh reality of misfortune, like poverty. They wanted to
present the world as it truly was, instead of an ideal world that most people dreamt of living in.
(Puchner 625-630).
I believe the purpose of most realistic writers was to shed light on parts of society that we
do not normally see. Realist writers attempted to describe life without idealization. Those who
were not fans of Realism did not like the mundane plots or obsession with character that
characterized this literary movement. Some critics complained that Realist writers focused too
much on the negative aspects of life (“Realism”). Instead of appreciating the truth and reality
behind realistic fiction, they thought it to be too sad and boring.