In Paul Bloom’s article “Against Empathy,” he discusses the distinction between empathy
and compassion, and the implications of each. One idea the article raises is the
“empathy-altruism” hypothesis which states that the more you empathize with others, the
more likely you are to help them. However, Bloom raises the point that this is not
necessarily true. He argues that empathy is biased, with people being more likely to
empathize with attractive people and people who are similar in terms of ethnicity. Bloom
also states that while empathy may be effective in stirring people to help an individual, it is
insensitive to statistical data which can lead to faulty public policy. Bloom further argues
that non-empathetic compassion is a better which involves a more distanced concern for
others is a more effective way to care, as evidenced by brain scanning studies that showed
more positive effects in affect and energy levels.
One question I have about the reading is why some people are naturally more empathetic.
In addition, the article states that women tend to be more empathetic, and I wonder why
this is so. Because of this apparent gender difference, I also wonder what evolutionary
value or reasons there might be behind empathy since the article claims it is exhausting
and compassion is a better alternative for our health and well being.