Jensen 2
higher level of education is a step in the right direction, schools are taking time away
from recess and using it for more class time. Only 19% of public schools have an
actual recess policy; 64% of public schools do not have a recess policy; and 17% do
have a policy but is limited to less than 20 minutes (Rochman n.p.).
When it comes to the topic of sports, most of us will readily agree that they
are beneficial for your health and that we all need to exercise in order to avoid major
health problems later on in life. Some of the benefits include lower blood pressure,
weight regulation, it combats heart conditions, boosts energy, improves mood, and
promotes better sleep (CDC). However, the main complaint against having PE in
public schools is that the programs are ineffective. Students, according to a study
done by Cornwell University, only get 16 minutes of exercise a day during PE class
(Cawley 64). So what are they doing with all of that other time? If kids are to get the
amount of exercise they need and PE is trying to supply that then there is a serious
problem if kids are only getting 16 minutes of exercise every day.
The call to remove public education based solely off the fact that the
programs are ineffective seems like a bad solution. Why not just call for a revision of
the PE program? This brings up another issue. How big of a role should public
education take on for children? Should we put public schools in charge of not only
the academic portion but also teaching children about good lifestyle habits? How
much should schools be in charge of teaching children? This is a difficult question to
answer because there are so many controversial views. A lot of parents are against