Handling a Hostile Work Environment
raise, working leniency or any other benefit[ CITATION Mat14 \l 1033 ]. The situation we are
dealing with is more associated with a hostile environment and as I stated earlier is where an
individuals work safety or performance is threatened by another employee[ CITATION Mat14 \l
1033 ]. While the dilemma we are dealing with currently isn’t categorized as a Quid Pro Quo
form of sexual harassment, we should be aware of the consequences for that as well. In this
situation, after doing some investigating, the hostile work environment complaint involved one
of our employees being verbally harassed and accused by another assembly line worker doing
their job in the same area as the victim. When dealing with harassment, processes such as
arbitration or ombuds might be introduced. Arbitration is defined as: “A process that uses a
neutral third party to make a binding decision, thereby eliminating the necessity of using the
court system.” [ CITATION Mat14 \l 1033 ] Arbitration is commonly used for sexual harassment
situations. Another dispute handler, Ombuds can be used in sexual harassment cases as well.
Ombuds is defined as “ Individuals outside the normal chain of command that act as problem
solvers for both management and employees” [ CITATION Mat14 \l 1033 ]. Like arbitration,
Ombuds can be used to handle these disputes but have no control of the outcome like arbitration
does. Ombuds and mediators are similar, they both offer low cost, informal sources of
information, and ultimately provide a suggested settlement between parties. Arbitrations on the
other hand, have more formal strict guidelines and publicly announce their decision in the
end[ CITATION Mat14 \l 1033 ]. With complaints of sexual harassment come consequences.
There are several caveats that accompany a hostile work environment dilemma such as legal
issues, diversity and equality issues, lost productivity, turnover and a tarnished reputation.
3