EXTERNAL INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
In order to better understand the macroeconomic context in which Silver Ships operates, it
is necessary to perform an industry analysis using Porters Five Forces. When looking at
the military and workboat industry, the threat of new entrants is low, which is mainly
caused by the high start-up costs and capital intensity in the aluminum military and
workboat industry. With these high costs of capital and operating costs, profit margins are
very low for new entrants. Additionally, the length of time needed to construct a ship adds
to the delayed nature of profits. In this industry there are many big players, including
SAFE Boats, Aluminum Chambered Boats, Willard Marine, Metal Shark Boats, and Silver
Ships. The market share these companies control would contribute to high barriers to entry
causing the threat of new entrants to remain low. These existing companies currently
benefit from economies of scale in production, distribution, and other areas of operation,
while also experiencing learning curve effects that would take a long time for new entrants
to take advantage of. The threat of substitutes in the military and workboat industry, like
the threat of new entrants, remains fairly low. Currently, no good substitutes are readily
available. Knowing that Silver Ship Ambar AM Series of boats were used for fire, rescue,
patrol, or research vessels while the SS Series of boats were mainly used for pilot, patrol,
survey, crew, or fire boats, this did not leave much room for substitutes, only rival boats. It
would also require higher switching costs to go from the military and workboat industry to
an alternative or substitute. In this industry, the major cost drivers include aluminum,
labor, and logistics, which account for most of the variance in production costs. With
aluminum being the second-most abundant metal in the Earths crust and a commodity,
there is no shortage of aluminum, which leaves suppliers in a weak position when
demanding a premium price or insisting on favorable terms. Additionally, it is difficult for
suppliers to offer a differentiated product when selling a commodity like aluminum, which
does not allow them to lower or raise the price they offer their customers without the
customers being able to switch easily. Competing suppliers could offer the same item for a
similar price and even with price fluctuations in the market for aluminum ship builders
could be managed by hedging, inventory management, and waste control. With all of this
being said, the bargaining power of suppliers is low. On the other hand, the bargaining
power of buyers is strong. Competition in the military and workboat industry is based on
price, the ability to meet bid specifications, performance and reliability, and the ability to
make timely deliveries. There is little differentiation and more standardized products in
this industry as a whole. When looking at Silver Ships specifically, they compete on
having quality products. There are many competitors that deliver quality products to rival
Silver Ships. While their products are high in quality, Silver Ships to need also focus on