Wal-Mart is the world’s largest retailer. Wal-Mart had achieved 12% lower prices on
average than its competitors. Wal-Mart had been able to implement its Every Day Low
Price strategy by focusing on 1) developing a sophisticated logistics system with heavy
information technology investments, 2) efficient distribution system by placing retail stores
close to distribution centers and using RFID technology, and 3) being a non-union
employer. Wal-Mart failed to take into account Germany’s cultural attitudes, especially
with regard to such matters as labor law and the role of unions. While the company’s anti–
union stance has been core to its US success in holding down costs and thus its ability
to offer discount pricing, Germans generally see a closer link between labor unions and
democracy.
Wal-Mart’s initial strategy was to refurbish the stores to improve appearance and maintain
price leadership through cost leadership as they had done in the US market. They would
overhaul the supply chain systems, and incorporate new scanning systems, centralized
distribution, and high quality customer service. By doing so, Wal-Mart had created a fierce
price war in Germany.
As of 2003, the Store Closing Law limits store hours to a 6:30 pm closing on weeknights
and 8 pm on Saturdays. Stores could not open at all on Sundays with exceptions granted
by state government or if they provided ‘essential’ functions: pharmaceutical drugs and
tobacco. It was instituted to protect domestic retailers from larger competitors who could
afford to keep their stores open longer with lower expenses. This was also reinforced by
religious factions who supported the importance of family time while the left side of the
political spectrum believed that retailers working longer than other workers was inherently
unfair. The shortened working hours have resulted in higher wages per worker for
retailers. For instance, full-time floor staff workers in Germany demanded a 19% premium
compared to UK workers on average
Most of the Global mergers and acquisitions failed to produce any benefit for the
shareholders or reduced value, which was mainly due to the lack of intercultural
competence. Lack of sensitivity and understanding of language barriers, local traditions,
consumer behavior, merchandising, and employment practices irreversibly damaged