Introduction: Externalities and its Major Causes
This paper discusses how positive and negative externalities can be detrimental to economic
efficiency and how corrective models such as Pigouvian Tax and property rights can minimise the
risk of market failure. Externalities can be positive (negative) and it is defined as a benefit (cost)
that affects people who are not directly involved in the consumption or production of that good
(Hubbard and O’Brien, 2013). Market failure occurs when economically efficient choices deviate
from privately optimal choices (Gillingham and Kenneth, 2010) and it causes discrepancy between
the private marginal benefits (costs) and social marginal benefits (costs) in either production or
consumption (Hubbard and O’Brien, 2013). This deviation between the two benefits (costs) makes
the market allocatively inefficient. This paper focuses on corrective measures that can mitigate
positive consumption externalities and negative production externalities to improve net social
welfare.
Difficulties in enforcing property rights in public goods is intangible and immeasurable, hence, it
is considered as one of the major culprits that causes externalities (Hubbard and O’Brien, 2013).
This difficulty arises with public goods due to the two characteristics that public goods have; non-
excludability and non-rivalry. Meaning that Non-payers cannot be excluded from using these
products and the consumption of the good by one unit would not reduce anyone else’s share, such
as, weather prediction or national defence (Mankiw, 2011). Another cause for some externalities
can result from “common pool resources” (CPR). CPRs are the resource systems created by
naturally or by humans which are large enough and therefore costly to exclude potential
beneficiaries and users (Carpenter, 1998). Unlike public goods, CPRs can be depleted by the use
of others, therefore, free rider problem of externality will arise and individuals using them would