d. What was the book value of Costco’s equity?
ANS.
a. At the end of the fiscal year, Costco had cash and cash equivalents of $4,801 million.
b. Costco’s total assets were $33,440 million.
c. Costco’s total liabilities were $22,597 million, and it had $6,157 million in debt.
d. The book value of Costco’s equity was $10,843 million.
3. Quisco Systems has 6.5 billion shares outstanding and a share price of $18. Quisco is
considering developing a new networking product in house at a cost of $500 million.
Alternatively, Quisco can acquire a firm that already has the technology for $900 million worth (at
the current price) of Quisco stock. Suppose that absent the expense of the new technology, Quisco
will have EPS of $0.80.
a. Suppose Quisco develops the product in house. What impact would the development cost have
on Quisco’s EPS? Assume all costs are incurred this year and are treated as an R&D
expense, Quisco’s tax rate is 35%, and the number of shares outstanding is unchanged.
b. Suppose Quisco does not develop the product in house but instead acquires the technology.
What effect would the acquisition have on Quisco’s EPS this year? (Note that acquisition
expenses do not appear directly on the income statement. Assume the firm was acquired at
the start of the year and has no revenues or expenses of its own, so that the only effect on
EPS is due to the change in the number of shares outstanding.)
c. Which method of acquiring the technology has a smaller impact on earnings? Is this
method cheaper? Explain.
ANS.
a. If Quisco develops the product in-house, its earnings would fall by $500 × (1 – 35%) = $325
million. With no change to the number of shares outstanding, its EPS would decrease by
to $0.75. (Assume the new product would not change this year’s revenues.)
b. If Quisco acquires the technology for $900 million worth of its stock, it will issue $900/18 = 50
million new shares. Since earnings without this transaction are $0.80 × 6.5 billion = $5.2
billion, its EPS with the purchase is .
c. Acquiring the technology would have a smaller impact on earnings, but this method is not
cheaper. Developing it in-house is less costly and provides an immediate tax benefit. The
earnings impact is not a good measure of the expense. In addition, note that because the
acquisition permanently increases the number of shares outstanding, it will reduce
Quisco’s earnings per share in future years as well.
4. The DuPont System allows us to relate the return on total assets and the return on common
equity to various measures of firm characteristics. Consider a firm with a ROA of 0.04.
If you were analyzing a firm that had sales of $12500 and total assets of $10000, how
much in earnings were available for common shareholders?
If the firm had common stockholders’ equity of $3300, what would be the firm’s ROE?