Medina 4
This study will collect both qualitative data and quantitative data. The quantitative data
will be gathered in two ways: the number of baseball players attending the focus group, and the
percentage of baseball players’ who have no interest in attending church-related activities will be
recorded and analyzed. The qualitative data will consist of the players’ reasoning for not
attending these events. Data will be collected by hosting focus groups in a relaxed setting (the
locker room) where the players will be at ease to voice their opinions in a non-judgemental
environment. It is important to also interview a baseball player who does attend mass to answer
questions like “what is of interest in attending the mass?” With this information, it will be
possible to provide incentives to other players who don’t attend mass in order to stimulate their
interest in attending religious events as they may share similar interests to a baseball player who
does attend mass. In addition, an in depth interview with one specific player who was not part of
the focus group will be conducted, so as to provide meaningful information to address more
specifically why a baseball player avoids or fails to attend religious events.
The harvesting of data has to be taken with great care so as to prevent personal bias of the
writer in interpreting the data. It is imperative to dictate what premises the author utilizes in
interpreting data and provide a personal perspective on the questions as well. This is named
“reflexivity” by Osmer. There is a double crisis facing scientific studies: interpretation:
observation itself is theory-laden, so data representation is never strictly factual; and legitimacy:
“depending on the form of science being performed and its driving intent,” the conditions for
legitimizing research differ