The objective of this essay is to see how does gender equality or gender mainstreaming
influence peace agreements. Specifically what effect it had on the Colombian peace
process? In this paper, I will talk of the importance of women as main actors in the
Colombian Peace agreement and why should the WPS agenda had a more prominent
position in Colombia. I will explore the cases that favor the more prominent involvement of
the WPS agenda and the disadvantages of this gender mainstreaming. I will show how does
this have an influence on the Colombian peace process and peace agreements in general.
Then I will assess the arguments that are behind them. I conclude this essay by outlining
some policy proposals for the main three actors: the Colombian government, the FARC,
and Ruta Pacifica.
Gender discrimination is an issue that has been present in humanity for ages. It has
different perspectives. While some people decide to ignore it, others fight against it. Many
variables are taken into account when we talk about feminism and women rights; making it
a complex topic to talk about. The ideals of women rights change depending on which part
of the world you are and of the social status you are living in. A clear example of this can
be how the Nordic countries and Latin American countries have political representation.
While in the Nordic countries, women are about the twenty percent of the political
representation; in Latin America there is almost no women representation in politics. For
example in Colombia a country that is going through a major change with the peace
process; we can see that there are other priorities before women and their rights. Colombia
is a country that has been in a fifty-two year armed conflict with the FARC; making the
priorities of the last few decades everything but women rights and their fair representation
in politics. Even in the resolution of the conflict women are not even in the main picture.
The current peace process between the government and the Revolutionary Armed