FINAL RESEARCH PAPER 2
Abstract
This paper will discuss Malden Mills and the decision that CEO Aaron Feuerstein’s
actions following the 1995 fire. The organization is associated with both business and basic
human values which makes it a brand with which anyone can relate. After the factory burned
down in a fire in 1995, Aaron Feuerstein chose to value his employees over what could have
been a huge monetary gain for the business (Leung, 2003). This went against typical business
practices of the time. Because of this, Aaron Feuerstein eventually became the example of
business ethics. The tenants of organizational behavior will through the actions of the Malden
Mills CEO, Aaron Feuerstein, and its employees by answering the following questions:
What does Malden Mills’ commitment to its employees prove or disprove about the
impact of values in action within the company?
Did the business model for Malden Mills and level of engagement with its employees
cloud decision maker’s business judgment and lead to the failure of the organization?
If so, to what extent?
Did Malden Mills’ CEO Aaron Feuerstein fail his organization by demonstrating
compassion for his employees? If so, what does this show about balancing the needs
of the employees with the needs of the business?