Turk 3
sent out by the USSF, as they viewed the USWNT as less important than the USMNT, even
though this research was taken at a time when the Women’s World Cup was current news
and
the Men’s World Cup had taken place a year prior (Coche, “Promoting Women’s Soccer through
Social Media: How the US Federation Used Twitter for the 2011 World Cup”). These two
3
examples clearly show the unfair treatment towards the USWNT by the USSF. Even though an
agreement was made and signed, the USSF are still finding ways to favor the men instead of
giving the women what they deserve in terms of resources and support.
In the United States current equality era, equal payment and resources should be seen as
preliminary. However, when these equality standards are not met, proof is often needed to sway
an audience to comply. The USWNT have had tremendous success at the international level
from their beginning. They have won three Women’s World Cup titles (and have medaled the
years they weren’t crowned champions), four Olympic women’s gold medals, and eight
CONCACAF Gold Cup wins. The men, on the other hand, haven’t even qualified for a World
Cup since 2010 and prior to that, the furthest they lasted in the tournament was the quarterfinals
in 1930 (Santhanam, “Data: How Does the U.S. Women’s Soccer Team Pay Compare to the
Men?”). Letting the team’s records speak for themselves,
the women’s success alone should grant them at least
an
equal wage to the men. If their success isn’t enough for the
US Soccer Federation, maybe they should consider how
much more money the USWNT is bringing in compared to
the USMNT. As stated by a 2016 USSF Budget Report, “the
3 Social media is how most of us fans receive our information about our team’s success in major
tournaments such as the Women’s World Cup. If the publicity isn’t being evenly proportioned between the
teams, then it’s not only a disservice to the USWNT, but to their fans as well.