7
out the causation between income and trade. This study indicated that there is a positive relation
between income and trade and physical and human capital formation and geographical factors are
helpful in the increase of trade.
Anderson & Wincoop (2003) justified the gravity model theoretical foundation. They took
the pool data from 30 states of Canada and USA for finding the relation between trade cost and
benefits using McCallum’s gravity equation. The finding of the study shows that the national
borders reduce the trade between these two countries at greater magnitude as compared to with
other states.
Carpenter, Watkinson & Rowcliffe (2004) aimed to get better specification with gravity
model by indulging the time-invariant country specific static as well as dynamic effects in terms
of potential trade. The study includes 32 importer and 11 exporter countries and data raging from
1991 to 2000 and estimated the export of goods and services. The study results incorporate that
the dynamic specification is providing more accurate results of actual as well as potential trade
than static formulation of gravity model.
Rahman (2010) estimated the trade potential of Australia by utilizing the cross-sectional
data of 50 countries for the years ranging 2001 to 2005. They used the Ordinary Least Square
method to estimate the gravity model equation. They took openness, distance, GDP, per capita
GDP, and common language as bilateral trade determinants of Australia. The study results show
that Australia has higher trade potential with Singapore, Argentina, Russian Federation, Portugal,
Greece, Chile, Philippine, Norway, Brazil and Bangladesh.
Simwaka (2011) attempts to estimate the expected trade potential of Southern Africa
Development Community’s Free Trade Agreement and to determine the difference between actual